Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Are there more Trees today?

rodmalm May 10, 2004 05:25 PM

Many environmentalists think so.--though the radical environmentalists would never admit this could be true.

There are a number of reason to support this position.

1) There are more "new growth" forests and fewer "old growth" forests. Anyone with common sense knows that you can support a LOT more smaller trees on the same area of land (with the same water supply available) than you could with much larger trees. In fact, larger trees can make so much shade that it is almost impossible for any other plants to grow beneath them. Smaller trees don't do this to nearly the same extent. Because of this, new growth forests allow seedling trees to exist close to existing trees while old growth forests do not.

2) Today, most developed countries have an increasing area of forest land, undeveloped countries have decreasing area of forest land. While decreasing forest land area slightly outweighs increasing forest land area, when reason #1 is taken into account, more trees today would still be true.

3) Barren areas, like deserts, that are then colonized by cities have trees planted where none existed prior. Another reason for more trees in developed countries.

4) Undeveloped countries use wood for fuel, developed countries do not.

5) Improved fire fighting techniques and technology have prevented fires from burning as much area as they used to, before these techniques existed. Unfortunately, the much higher fuel available, per acre, to these fires today (too many trees and brush) makes today's fires far more intense than they used to be, because we have been too successful in increasing the tree numbers. This, in turn, is beginning to make fires harder to fight so now the area these fires consume is increasing. (But the damage from these fires hasn't made up for the increase in trees -- yet.)

www.strike-the-root.com/4/langr/langr2.html

Check out greenspirit.com (founded by the original founder of greenpeace, after he decided to leave greenpeace when it was taken over by lawyers and environmental fraud artists/extremists).

Notice how I start a new thread when posting about a new subject, unlike some hypocrites here who radically change the subject within a thread and then accuse me of doing so.

Rodney

Replies (5)

rearfang May 10, 2004 06:40 PM

Actually we went through this before Rodney. The concensus was that though there may be more trees per acre there are a lot less acres of trees.

That and the endless Iraqian greenhouse Bush torturing the global warming liberal who's fault it was debate is about as orrigional a topic as.........

Frank
-----
"The luxury of not getting involved departed with the last lifeboat Skipper..."

rodmalm May 10, 2004 09:26 PM

But since pulatus is still tring to argue how ridiculous this point is, without having any evidence to refute it, in a number of older threads (that aren't even related) I though I would refresh this topic with a new thread that had some references that confirm what I was saying.

It's amazing how his "ideas" of what is ridicuous always seem to have a lot of evidence to show they are most likely true.

Rodney

rearfang May 10, 2004 10:17 PM

See that's the problem with Herman.s new thread. Who's gonna argue about more skin and less gore (no not that gore Rodney...)

Hey...I just planted five new trees in my yard (adding to the number!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Now I know I'm up too late...Goodnight!

Frank
-----
"The luxury of not getting involved departed with the last lifeboat Skipper..."

rodmalm May 11, 2004 08:14 AM

How many trees did you have in your yard before you planted the new ones?

What kind did you plant?

Rodney

rearfang May 11, 2004 10:36 AM

We are on a big corner lot so there was room. we have four oranges (that may get removed by the county because of citrus canker in the area) One carmenbola, seven queen palms, two Llang Llang trees. We just added a dwarf magnolia, a cinnimon, an allspice, an african tulip and another flowering tree that I'm not sure about. We are trying to establish an "umbella" then we wil plant the lower levels. It's becoming so dry this year that shrubbery does poorly unless you water heavily on a daily basis.

Frank
-----
"The luxury of not getting involved departed with the last lifeboat Skipper..."

Site Tools