Frank,
I'll admit that you did say that Rap was a form of poetry. However, you also stated that it was "Primitive," meaning, to me, that it should not be used. If I understood that reasoning correctly, then no one should be writing Shakespearean Sonnets anymore. He did that over 500 years ago - that is FAR too primitive for our modern, civilized cultures! After all, Africans were using Rap (or a form of it) at the same time, as were slaves being exported from Africa. OH - but WAIT - I forget - Shakespeare comes from a civilized country, and, therefore, does not count in this debate, right?
Primitive or not, where do you think human cultures all stemmed from? One or several very primitive cultures, by modern standards, and many of the traits we had in those primitive cultures are still present and accepted. Rap and Shakespearean sonnets may be primitive, but that does not mean that it should be dismissed in the English classroom, as you seem to be doing.
And, yes, I see free verse as an acceptable form of poetry. Prose is comprised of other literature - short stories, novels, and such. Poetry is made of special language - today, using "thee" and "thou" and "thy" instead of "you" and "yours" would be considered special language. Repeating sentences, as in lilroach's repeated line, "In my paradise," is considered special language - in everyday language, we do not say the exact same line over and over and over.
The Complete Rhyming Dictionary sounds like it would be very helpful - depending on what FORM of poetry you're writing. From what I am reading about it, however, it's focused primarily on rhyming, something which CAN be used in poetry, but isn't always.
Have you ever heard of Walt Whitman? He's a very famous poet, of whom I am sure you have heard. How about his poem, Eidolons? I'm looking at it right now - there is no certain rhythm. There is no certain rhyme. There is no certain meter. In case you don't have his poetry on hand, here's a link to this poem: www.kalliope.org/digt.pl?longdid=whitman2001060409
Another poem with the same certainable lack of rhythm, rhyme, and meter, is An Old Man's Thought of School, which you can also see at www.daypoems.net/plainpoems/2096.html
The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th Edition, defines Free Verse as:
term loosely used for rhymed or unrhymed verse made free of conventional and traditional limitations and restrictions in regard to metrical structure. Cadence, especially that of common speech, is often substituted for regular metrical pattern. Free verse is a literal translation of the French vers libre, which originated in late 19th-century France among poets, such as Arthur Rimbaud and Jules Laforgue, who sought to free poetry from the metrical regularity of the alexandrine. The term has also been applied by modern literary critics to the King James translation of the Bible, particularly the Song of Solomon and the Psalms, to certain poems of Matthew Arnold, and to the irregular poetry of Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass. The form is probably most closely associated with such English and American poets as Ezra Pound, Amy Lowell, and T. S. Eliot who sought greater liberty in verse structure. Other poets who used the free verse form were William Carlos Williams, Carl Sandburg, and Marianne Moore.
www.bartleby.com/65/fr/freevers.html
Yes, Walt Whitman uses Rhythm, Rhyme and Meter in other poems, like O Captain, My Captain, but not all the time, as I have mentioned above.
As for helping lilroach, I'm not sure that you can unless you know exactly what her teacher is looking for. I would say, if lilroach went to the trouble of writing her long poem, she's probably on the right road - I've never had a student go to that much effort without being on the right track.
As for your condescending critiquing of her poem, if that is how your teachers would have treated you, then I am very sorry to hear that. Most students would hear that and say, "What's the point of trying again - I failed miserably the first time." I know because I've seen teachers who treat their students with a very condescending manner all the time - especially around TAKS-time. According to the teachers' mannerisms, the students can't do ANYthing right. And, Yes, I would have failed because I would have ultimately quit trying if that's how the teachers always treated me. The number 1 rule for teachers - nowadays, at least - is to begin with praise and then critique. You WANT the student to keep trying.
I have said all that I have to say on this matter, so, if I do not respond to you about this again, do not think it is because I finally "saw the light" - just that I have made all my points and do not wish to continue debating this.
~~Dusty Windom
-----
So Many Alleles, So Little Time...! 


@
~~The Gecko Barn~~