>On another forum a debate has arisen. SEveral of the questions have me wanting to verify some of the things I know, and also find out some of the things I don't know.
>Someone there said that snakes have W and Z chromosomes instead of X and Y chromosomes like humans as their gender determining chromosomes. Does anyone know if the gender determining chromosomes in snakes have been officially named?
>It was also mentioned that in snakes females have a WZ (two different gender-determining chromosomes) and that males have ZZ, which is exactly opposite of humans. Does anyone know if this is true and can you cite references if possible?
I've seen snake gender chromosomes referred to as Z and W in several papers. I'd have to dig around a little to find some. The university library has an atlas of karyotypes (chromosomes) from a variety of species that includes some snakes. I can post that reference in a day or two.
The gender chromosomes in most birds are Z and W, and colubrid snakes follow the same pattern. Boid snakes do not seem to have sex-determining chromosomes of different sizes. I don't know about other families of snakes.
>Another item for discussion is temperature-related sex-determination. Have there been any formal (or informal) studies to determine that temperature does NOT effect the genders of the babies? I would love to hear of any studies informal or formal that go to proving or disproving this.
I know of one formal study where northern pine snakes were incubated at a variety of temperatures, but I don't think the sexes of the babies were recorded. Have to hunt that up.
>Finally: Albinism. This question relates specifically to California Kingsnakes (though I'm sure that the answers for this question would relate to all kingsnakes, and perhaps all north american colubrids, if not all snakes everywhere)... Is it possible that albinism is a sex-linked trait in California Kingsnakes? Can anyone give me a logical argument using mendelian genetics (or any other way) that is clear and concise about why it COULD NOT be sex-linked? (or if they have an argument that is clear and concise as to how it could be sex-linked, I would love to hear about that too)
I have never bred California kings, so I can't give you a positive answer. But here is an argument for why amelanistic is not sexlinked in corn snakes. You can use the same reasoning for kings:
1) The Z (or mammallian X) chromosome is much longer than the W (or mammalian Y) chromosome. Generally a sexlinked locus refers to a locus on the Z (or X) chromosome that is not paired in the W (or Y) chromosome.
2) A female MUST show the effect of a mutant gene that is sexlinked in her single Z chromosome.
3) A male shows the effect of a mutant gene if the mutant is recessive to the normal allele and is homozygous for the mutant allele. This is true for both sexlinked and autosomal loci in males. As amelanistic corns can be produced by mating two normally colored snakes, amelanistic must be a recessive mutant gene.
4) Theoretical results of crosses if amelanistic is a recessive mutant. Symbols--W = female chromosome, a = amelanistic on Z chromosome, A = normal allele on Z chromosome.
Male homozygous amelanistic (aa) x female normal (AW) -->
1/2 Aa = male normal (heterozygous for amelanistic)
1/2 aW = female amelanistic
ALL the amelanistics from this cross MUST be female.
5) Actual results of a male amelanistic corn x a female normal corn: all babies, both male and female, are normal. (Source: Bern Bechtel's original cross of an amelanistic male corn x female normal corn. Same results in a mating of my corn snakes.) Therefore, the amelanistic locus in corns is not sexlinked.
If the same results come from a Cal king mating, then you can rule out sexlinkage.
Paul Hollander