I think we all agree that some for sure hets don't have it. I can't explain why some should and some don't but I really don't have a problem with this as that seems to be what is happing with the granite and green Burmese python mutations.
The biggest challenge to this sign as reliable seems to me to be the idea that some normals have it. I'd like to see some pics of these normals to see if it is the exact same thing or not. It is complicated either way as I'm seeing varying degrees of the mark in possible hets so I could easily see some normals with something a lot like the less extreme possible hets. Oh well, nature doesn't owe us an easy one.
I just got my first 2004 clutch of eggs this morning from a 50% chance het pied male with the mark to a $45 pet store girl with the mark. Unfortunately there where 3 slugs and only four good-looking eggs (will candle tonight) averaging 73 grams and one of the four has a nipple deformity. So, I'm not holding my breath for a pied to pop out in two months but it would be a nice validation for the sign if one does.
Here is the pet store mom's belly. Why would I even think it’s possible that she is het pied and this isn’t just an example of a normal with the sign? I believe that there are a lot of hets randomly distributed in the wild, perhaps at rates as high as 1 in 200. What makes the wild bred recessive morphs rare is the chance of two 1 in 200 snakes getting together (1 in 40,000 if completely random – producing only 1 in 160,000 homozygous – may not be random due to localized inbreeding).
