Here's a copy of the letter I sent. Feel free to mine it for ideas for your own letters.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Govenor Pataki
As I am sure you are aware, the NY state assembly and senate recently passed legislation prohibiting the ownership and sale of various types of wild animals (bills A 2684 and S 7616, respectively). Unfortunately, the law is far too restrictive, going beyond what is necessary to safeguard the public and unnecessarily infringing on the rights of the people of New York. While a very good case could be made for restricing the ownershp, sale and transport of giant cats, wolves, bears, and dangerously venomous snakes, this bill, if signed into law, would also prohibit the ownership of a great number of harmless species, many of which are popular in the pet trade.
In particular, the bill bans "the family Boidae". While the boidae does include all five species of dangerously large constrictors (the reticulated python, the African rock python, the Indian python, the amethysine python, and the green anaconda), it also includes such species as the rosy and rubber boas, small snakes less than 3 feet in length native to the Western United States. The rosy boa is a popular pet, as are other small boids such as the ball python and sand boas. Medium sized boids, such as the red tailed boa and carpet pythons are also popular pets and have not caused _any_ recorded human fatalities or serious injuries.
Other prohibited animals are similarly not a danger to the public. My particular area of interest is the monitor lizards. There is only one monior lizard which is a danger to human life, and this monitor is not mentioned in the bill! (This monitor is, of course, the Komodo monitor, also known as the Komodo dragon). Instead, the bill outlaws the posession of such docile and popular monitors as the Asian water monitor (Varanus salvator) and the whitethroat monitor (Varanus albigularis, note that this species is also known as the Cape monitor and blackthroat monitor). Both of these species become comfortable around humans, even friendly, and pose little danger to their keepers, much less the general public. The teeth of the white throat monitor, in particular, are adapted for crushing hard shelled prey and the bites of this monitor, while painful, cause little actual injury. There is no record of any of the monitor species prohibited in this bill ever killing a human. Compared to domestic animals such as dogs, horses, and cattle (all of which are responsible for many attacks and several human deaths per year), these monitor species pose little danger.
I am aware that many people feel uncomfortable around snakes or even reptiles in general. However, we must not allow the irrational fears of a certain percentage of the population from dictating what we do in the safety of our own homes. If this bill becomes law, it will not end the ownership of the above mentioned harmless reptiles, it will merely create a black market for these animals and drive their collection underground. Thousands of otherwise law abiding New Yorkers would be turned into criminals. I urge you to veto this bill in the form it now stands. Only when the prohibitions on the harmless reptile species are removed shold this bill become law.
Sincerely
Luke W. Campbell, Ph.D.
Macedon, NY
lwcampbe@uci.edu