>> It seems that the higher elevation snakes have a higher tendency to have crossovers and abberant patterns, but I'm sure there are some exceptions to that rule out there as well.
interesting, that would conform to louis porras' hypothesis that higher-altitude hondurans are the tricolors that darken with age, because the darker patterns would help those snakes better thermoregulate at their higher/colder habitats.
>>
>>Here is an abberant pattern, high altitude pyro I photographed and released last summer in the Huachucas.
is the aberration merely the ring a third of the way back that's broken? if so, this might be a good time to start a discussion of what's an aberration & what's not...yes, that is an aberration from a pattern of all fully-formed rings, perpendicular to the horizon, etc., but it might not be an aberration in terms of the norm...i see that kind of pattern break on many pyros & other tricolors...in fact, i use them as a sort of "bar code" to keep records on snakes, noting just a few of those creates a unique code that could pick a given snake out of 100. So is an "aberrant" snake one with an IMPERFECT pattern? or one with an abnormal pattern?
Interesting question, i think. At an extreme, a snake with more or fewer crossovers than the viewer is accustomed to could be considered aberrant, for example.
terry