It's been a busy summer and I've been away from the forum for a few weeks but I had to share this...
After scanning the last few pages of the forum one might think twinning is more common than it is, but in reality it's still a rare occurence.
Some of you may recall last year I bred my female het ghost to a friend's butterscotch ghost male and we produced 3 het ghost offspring. This year I bred the same female to my butterscotch ghost male (different bloodline), got 8 fertile eggs and hatched out 9 babies. Of the 5.4 hatchlings, one egg produced 2 females. The mass of the 2 hatchling females is about equal to any one of the 'non-twin' siblings. But how many GHOSTS did I produce? Not a one out of 9 babies. My male butterscotch ghost is a Doug Beard (Fauna & Flora)-produced animal. According to Doug it should be compatible with just about any het ghost except possibly green ghost hets.
So is my 100% "het" ghost really a het? Evidence certianly suggests otherwise. So now I have to update the seller of this supposedly "proven" het and decide on a course of action. It's definitely put a crimp in my ghost-producing project. It's simple math determining the lost income from not seeing what should be about 2.2 ghosts in this clutch. But on the flip-side I'm grateful to have produced even hets with the ghost market being what it is. Odds are pretty good I'll hang onto 2 of the 4 females. It would seem that's the only way to assure of future compatibility with my male ghost.
Anybody experience any similar ghost/het ghost situations?
Scott J. Michaels DVM



