no girlfriend, then why the hell are you responding to my post then...??? hahaha.. just kidding.
As far as crossing them goes.. That would be an easy thing for many people to do, as there is probably 20 times more prasinus males, macraei males, beccari males, than there are females.. So, instead of somebody taking the time, and spending the money to track down a female of the same species, they opt to go the lazy way, and cross it to a more common species female, such as beccari.
While I am not totally against this, as the animals will never be released back into the wild again, I do not understand why someone would opt to do this, when the prasinus complex in general, is not being produced consistently by any means. All captive hatchings, at least here in the states, have been sporadic, usually resulting in only a small percentage of the eggs laid hatching. If nobody is breeding the pure species, why opt to go and hybridize them?
While I must say, that some of the crosses would probably be spectacular in appearance(if they were compatible), I would very much rather work on trying to get F1 hatchlings of a pure species first, then worrying about the compatibility of "sister" species..
As with FR, he produced several generations of his gouldi complex, and then had the resources, time, and extra animals to "experiment" with.
Once somebody starts popping tree monitors out like pez dispensers, then, maybe they should/could experiment and see how truly close-related they are. Observations of the reproductive structures in the complex have noted that each species has somewhat differing structures(in shape). Kind of like puzzle pieces.. some pieces might not fit another puzzle...
Mike Stefani(look for his site's link at the top of the forum heading) crossed a prasinus x beccari and got several eggs, with one baby actually hatching. It was a very beautifully colred/patterned individual, basically half in between the appearance of each parent species. Unfortunately that animal did not survive into adulthood. I am curious as to what it would have looked like as an adult animal, for juveniles' colors and patterns are a bit different than the adults, especially in beccari.
So bacially, that's where I stand on the whole crossing of tree monitor species. While like I said, I am not entirely against hybridizing closely related animals, but as for their current status, I would advise against doing so. I always wondered though, with that V. prasinus amarillo(see pic below), if you crossed it to a macraei, you'd get a green prasinus-looking animal...
Hey all of you artists out there.., you can experiment with the chromatic scale with the tree monitors... all we need are some reds, and whites(leucistics-ew, gross), and purples... What an even more awesome hobby that would make...chromatic diversity within the prasinus complex... yeesh.. you've got me daydreaming...haha..
there are actually, now that I think about it, two more different looking species/subspecies of prasinus-type monitors in indo- awaiting to be described/taxonomied.. I think the germans are claiming these ones as well...ooh the suspense..
take care,
I would also like to hear everybody else's opinions on this subject. Do you feel that it is a good idea for people to start crossing tree monitor species before the individual species are bred in numbers? Let me know, I'm curious as to what input you've got...
bob

The Odatriad