Although I agree to some extent with what Paul said below I'll throw my 2 cents in here as well. After many a discussion with various crocophiles the world over I have come to the conclusion while there are slight differences in these animals most appear to be as much related to the habitat they live in as per any genetic differences.
Personally I see animals offered as locality forms as a way to basically stand out in the consumer marketplace. If one scale means $500 more dollars to you then by all means purchase.
But in my collection I have a niloticus from Madagascar, South Africa, and East Africa. Although I have questions about the latter. All grow at the same rate and all are getting huge. I'm not sold that one form grows larger than another because of genetic reasons, I think they grow larger because the habitat they live in simply allows it to be so. Just like the niloticus in the Sahara stay small due to limited environmental conditions.....are they genetically predisposed to smaller size or just forced into that pattern because that is what the environment allows for survival? I bet on the latter.
I'm sure genetic variance occurs, just not sold that the 'size' limits often stated are at all reliable.
So would i spend extra cash on a locality..........IMHO, no. At least not something I would overspend or go out of my way to do.
But then I could be wrong............
>>Does anyone have any photos or information regarding these subspecies, info as far as appearance, coloration, size, etc..
>>
>>Particulary the west african form, aslo info on their value here in the USA might be good as well.
>>
>>Suggested subspecies: C. n. africanus (East African Nile crocodile), C. n. chamses (West African Nile crocodile), C. n. corviei (South African Nile crocodile)