I was talking with a local pyro afficionado the other day about the appearance of the wild pyros we see in the "sky island" mountain ranges of SE Arizona. These animals have a reputation for having lower band counts, more reduced black, and brighter reds than your average pyro. We had both seen snakes that fit that description in the wild, and maybe they are more common here than elsewhere, but they seem to be more of the exception than the rule. On average they definitely have lower band counts, but reduced black and brighter red are not common. The average wild pyro from these ranges has a very dark red, muddy white, and lots of black crossovers. It is more common to find one that is almost totally black down the back than to find one with no crossovers at all. The variability is incredible and probably the reason for the ssp. "woodini" being dropped.
A couple of months ago I posted a photo I took of a wild pyro and posted the mountain range I found it in. A couple of people who lived more than a thousand miles away questioned whether I had the locality right! Are the reputations of certain locales often exxagerated? Do breeders with a pair of WC locality snakes breeding for traits that aren't the norm in that locality? Just food for thought.
2004 AZ herp photos

