In response to a long thread below:
A paper was published a while back on a series of successful operations. Successful defined here as all snakes recovered from surgery almost straight away and without any severe pain, discomfort, etc and all continue to remain in immaculate health.
That paper is online at:
http://www.smuggled.com/VenArt1.htm
Based on the content of this paper and ongoing results, the procedure (done properly) cannot be condemned on the basis of adverse affects or cruelty on the captive snake.
Criticisms of the procedure on this and other forums deal with a small number of main issues along the lines as follows:
1/ For the wrong reasons. As in to "show off", make false claims of handling skills and the like.
These are inevitable and yes, some ops may be done for the wrong reasons. However this is not reason to blanket condemn it. The same argument taken to the logical end can be used to ban cars, guns, and most other things. Misuse of a car by one person does not mean cars per se should be banned.
2/ Claims against improper operations (cruelty) are valid and the best defence against these is to make sure that the proper procedures are available to those who have valid reasons to engage them. Banning the operations will simply send them "underground" and perhaps increase likelihood of so-called backyard jobs which are more likely to botch and harm the reptile.
3/ The next major argument against the venomoid procedure is that it is "not natural", removes the snakes beauty and so on. These are value judgements by an individual and must not be imposed on others or used to try to stop the venomoid procedure. Persons on this list should be aware that the same "not natural" argument was used to ban the private (and sometimes public) keeping of reptiles and other creatures on the basis that it is "not natural" to put them in cages.
I assume most posting here do not advocate the banning of caged reptiles on the basis of "not natural".
In terms of the venomoid arguments (for/against) all three above cannot be totally upheld by the antis or totally rebutted by the "pros" but ultimately must be decided on a case by case basis realising that there will be dissent among people.
But surely the hostile flames can be resisted.
Finally, there are numerous other issues that have arisen in the wake of the first successful series of operations here in Australia that work both for and against the argument.
The against part relates to whom and when the operation is done and the management of the snakes pre and post operation (the operation itself now being an effective non-issue as it is apparantly risk-free for the snake), including selection of snakes for surgery.
Another issue to emerge fairly rapidly has been the BENEFITS TO THE CAPTIVE SNAKE arising from venomoid surgery.
This I have not seen broached on this list, but I have raised it elsewhere.
The benefits to the snake are measurable and identifiable and arise from the fact that the snake can be routinely "free handled" as in mid body support with hands as opposed to sticks, tongs and neck grabbing, the latter of which while manageable for the handler in terms of avoiding fatal bite, do stress the snake more than "free handling".
No one can deny this assertion, the best evidence for which is that no competant snake keeper uses hooks and tongs when handling placid pythons.
Venomoid snakes "free handled" rapidly become more tractable and well-adjusted captives than their "hot" counterparts and the magnitude of this benefit far outweighs the short-term discomfort experienced by the snake at time of operation (assuming the operation is done properly).
This benefit to the captive snakes themselves will ultimately be the main driver for the demand for venomoid snakes, not the various other reasons or excuses advanced on this and most other forums (by the antis).
ALL THE BEST
Venomoid surgery - Trouble free operations


