But I like the Zoo Med better and then just use a regular light bulb to produce the needed heat. I've read a lot about all of them. I'd say if you had a huge enclosure where the lights were several feet above the chucks (like 3-6 feet) I'd go with the mercury vapor like they do in zoo setups. However, the benefit you get from them in a small enclosure like most people have in their homes isn't noticable and you have to really make sure that you monitor the heat output from them. They cost a lot more than the Zoo Med.
I've also had a problem with the Mercury Vapor burning out early. I haven't been able to get one to last more than 6-8 months. (This is because they moved around on the top of my enclosure when I open and close it. They should really be in a fixed overhead sockets that you don't have to move to get into the enclosure. If you move the light fixtures it rattles the bulb ever so slightly and WILL cause them to burn out in the 6-8 month range.) SO in the long run it wasn't cost effective for me. A number of other people on the Pagona listserve complained of having the same problem with them, so I know it wasn't just a fluke.
The ZooMed bulb is superior to the ESU in all the test literature that I've read. The following is a good summation on the whole arguement on types of lighting.
Melissa Kaplan is the author of Iguana's for dummies series and her sight has more scientific information on general herp care than any other:
http://www.anapsid.org/mercuryvapor.html
She also offrt this Link on MBD, which we all want to avoid:
http://edcenter.med.cornell.edu/CUMC_PathNotes/Skeletal/Bone_04.html
The very best for you chuck and lighting would be to get him out in real sunlight for 15-20 minutes a day weather permiting.
NOTHING beats the real sunlight even in just small amounts. It is still the best and nothing fully duplicates its true benefits.