Very cool, Pierson. Are you basing your thoughts here on looks alone?
Yes, I am basing my thoughts primarily on looks (which can be a good indicator!) but also on habitat and behavior. Everything is relatively hypothetical at this point but that's how science starts, right?
Am I to assume (remember I am very naive when it comes to stuff like this) that an animal will continue to LOOK exactly the same throughout it's entire stay here on planet earth given no influence from other animals?
Not at all. Environmental conditions can change the way a snakes looks as well. For example, snakes in higher altitudes tend to be darker than their lowland conspecifics (Black Rats, Timber Rattlesnakes, Kingsnakes) so that they can thermoregulate more efficiently. Disturbances such as hurricanes, floods, fires, etc. can cause a bottlenecking effect to genetic drift by killing off the majority of a population and leaving behind a minority group that is genetically unrepresentative of the parent population (goini?). Sexual selection can cause an animal to change, even to the point where the changes hamper its survival (classic example = peacocks). Animals change all the time in response to a thousand different factors. It's the form that can adjust to all these factors simultanesouly that is the the longest lasting.
We know this because we can recreate population dynamics in an experimental setting and control for different factors. Haven't you ever toyed around with feeder mice colonies Mark? I started out with 80% amelanistic mice and by preferentially feeding off amel babies, I almost eliminated the amel gene from my mice colony within a year.
Perhaps fasciata IS the species for all of 'em? (as before)
The more I learn, the more I realize that animals don't behave in accordance with our species concepts. The spcies concept works most of the time fairly well but their are too many exceptions to ignore. I will say that axonomy is a great tool for scientific communication, but it is an imprecise tool.
Let me see if I can illustrate my point a little better:
I only find entirely striped snakes in coastal areas that have not been developed. The interface between spartina salt marsh and mainland habitats is usually intact save for an occassional small roadway an associated ditches.
Once I venture into areas that are diked or drained, have beach houses, or have some other sort of immediate habitat alteration I start finding the spotted forms. The intensity of the spotting/banding and frequency of spotted individuals has been proportional to the disturbance of habitat. I find these spotted individuals outside of salt marsh too. For example, that female I posted was found in a shallow freshwater ditch lined with sawgrass. The creek eventually flowed into salt marsh but not for several hundred meters from where she was found. I have found pure fasciata in the immediate area.
I realize that range overlaps and human intervention are at work , but you certainly must have more to go on than the outward appearance of the snakes, right?
This isn't supported by many specimens but I have noticed a tendency for the spotted forms to be larger, have thicker heads, and be much more prone to bite when captured. Hell...even my spotted CB animals are more bitey than their striped siblings. This could be due to fasciata genetic influence or could be the same phenomenon scene in some Thamnophis species: striped babies are more prone to flee and checkered babies are more defensive.
I'd love to do genetic work in the future, especially on clarkii outside of Florida where little work has been done. I am in touch with a herpetologist who is doing DNA analysis of fasciata/compressicauda/taeniata on the east coast of Florida and he'll be getting DNA from all my animals to include in his analysis. Hopefully he can discern some pattern between a snake's phenotype and their genotpye.
I have to get trained in genetics first though. I couldn't even get into a genetics class here at Davidson this year despite a weeks worth of begging and pleading. It was very frustrating but probably for the best. I've got two Ratsnake spatial ecology papers to write before November so I've got plenty on my plate.
It looks like my feet are going to be wet for a while!
-----
Pierson Hill

Herpetology and Herpetoculture