No, you're pretty much wrong on all points. Carmel albinos are a simple recessive trait where some of the normal pigments of the snake are missing causing it to look like a different color then a normal ball python, it is not related to either the axanthic or the albino mutations. Axanthic is a term used to describe a snake that is missing most of it's yellow coloring causing it to look more black and white then a normal ball, whereas albino (actually amelanistic) is a term given to an animal that is missing it's melanine which produces the black coloring. Some of your confusion probably comes from the Snakekeepers term for their line of carmel which they call 'Xanthic albinos' (not Axanthic)
In breeding together two het for carmel albino ball pythons approximatly 1/4 of the offspring would be actual carmel albinos, the rest would be normal looking snakes that are possible carriers of the carmel gene.
While it's not a 'designer' morph I would still encourage you to work with it if you have the opportunity. In my opinion it is one of the prettiest and most underrated of the ball python morphs out there.
Mark
>>so the caramel albino is an axanthic albino right? if this is the case...why wouldnt you (from a het to het breeding) get axanthics, caramel albinos, albinos and normals? im just thinking that this is a carrier for both genes.
>>
>>im thinking of purchasing a pir of hets, and just wanted some words from the wise thanks in advance for a reponse! philip wheeles