I have some of Speake's papers somewhere...I should send them to Doug to post on indigossnakes.com.
Basically, no disrespect to Dr. Speake, but I think they beleived that you could start a population by simply releasing a bunch of snakes. Since then, they have found thatit is simply not
that easy.
Unfort.,none of the animals were radiotagged, so it ws tough to keep track of them.
My thoughts:
1- as oldherper suggested, I think they underestimated the sheer size of habitat required.
2- even if suitable habitat was available...when an animal is GONE, something takes it's place. Numbers of other predators were probably higher, taking the place of the absent indigo. Throwing a bunch of new snakes into the mix just doesn't work. It upsets the ecological balance, and the animals that were there, and have evolved (sorry, there's the "e" word again) for thousands of years to be in that tiny little microhabitat (be it a region of S. MS, S. AL, etc) simply are better equipped by instict to make it in that region. They are hardwired for surviving in that specific micrphabitat, whuch probably has many differences from where the indigos that were released evolved in. Although they may seem very subtle to us, they may be huge to a snake. Is this making any sense? B/c it's just a theory.
It is always better to protect exisiting populations than to create new ones, or re-establish what has been erraticated.