The following bothered me a little, and I want to clarify something just a bit:
"...and even if i was keeping him just as a breeder unless his quality of life was low id still keep him and do all that I could to keep him alive, just because hes banged up a little doesnt mean hes worthless."
You're right, of course, when you say that the animal is not "worthless" just because he has the defect of kinks along his spine. However, as a breeding animal, he is worthless, if it is the goal to make certain that no possibly genetic defects be propagated in the greater corn snake gene pool.
With the priviledge of breeding animals also comes the responsibility that we do no harm to the species with which we are working. That entails (among other considerations) that no animals with genetic faults are used in breeding programs so that, as nearly as is possible, genetic deformities are isolated and not passed on to future geneerations of cornsnakes and their owners.
That is why Kat suggested that the animal be euthanized, if it is not just going to be a pet. It is not merely a question of what is best for a specific animal in some cases. Sometimes, the responsible breeder has to question what is best for the species as a whole and make the tough decisions.
I hope that this is taken in the spirit in which it was written. I mean no offence by it at all.
-----
Darin Chappell
Hillbilly Herps
PO Box 254
Rogersville, MO 65742