Well, I'm probably the wrong person to ask that question, since I really, really, REALLY dislike the idea of using a locailty name to describe a phase based merely on appearances. I actually came up with the idea of calling Okeetee phase animals "lookatees" and Okeetee locaility animals "Hunt Club corns" just so there would not be the confusion that now exists in the minds of many people. But I digress ... 
The usage of the name "reverse okeetee" (whether I like it or not) is still one that is purely subjective. It is generally accepted that an animal with wide white borders, deep red saddles, and bright orange background is a "reverse okeetee." However, how wide is "wide"? How deep is "deep red"? How bright is "bright orange"? Once the name is based upon a purely subjective quality such as appearance (as opposed to a definitively identified gene), the name quickly begins to have no meaning beyond a common consensus, and how often can we have a common consensus on each individual animal offered for sale? It's a problem that we often overlook merely because generalities are what they are, and there are no easy fixes due to the wide usages of the terms in question.
So, what I guess I'm saying is this: You call it a reverse okeetee, if that is what you think it is. No one will think less of you for doing so, but not everyone will agree with your assessment. Some will object to the use of a locality term in connection with a snake with no locality background. Others will differ with you concerning whether your snake meets the "definition" of reverse okeetee. Some will say, "Wow! That's the best reverse okeetee I've ever seen!" Because the term is so broad in its usage, the reactions to it will be as varied as the population that views your animals.
For me, I'd call it an amel, and just let everyone else see what they want to see in it. That way no one is disappointed.
Good luck with them! 
-----
Darin Chappell
Hillbilly Herps
PO Box 254
Rogersville, MO 65742