Gary:
Neonates from all other regions, Utah, Washington, Oregon and various parts of Calif. invariably are some shade of flesh coloration, darker on the dorsal side gradually becoming lighter on the side and ventrals. Orangish-flesh is what I might characterize such neonate coloration. The shading or intensity of such coloration varies within and between regions.
However, when I first examined a litter of boas produced by Rick Staub's Napa County pair, I made note at the time that they possessed a very distinct medium brown dorsal coloration and a distinct lemon-yellow ventral surface. That was in about 2001. Then last year I received three neonates found on the road in NE Sonoma county with the exact same coloration. The Napa county and NE Sonoma county specimens all come from the population that occurs in the greater Mt. St. Helena region. I have examined two more neonates produced this year from Rick's pair and again the same distinct dorsal and ventral coloration.
Neonates from other regions, besides having a light orangish-flesh color ventrally, may have a hint of yellow ventrally as well. But nothing so distinct as with the Mt. St. Helena area neonates in which the ventral color is a very distinct lemon-yellow.
As mentioned, the E. Bay neonates have the identical coloration. The male parent from Berkeley also has a ventral color that is lemon yellow. But some boas in other regions also exhibit such a rich, lemon-yellow color ventrally so that is not nearly as unusual as what I observe in these neonates.
Naturally, a whole host of question arise. What is the coloration of neonates from the (West Bay region) Santa Cruz Mt. and south? What is the extent of the distribution of this form of neonate coloration in Calif.?
Richard F. Hoyer