I read Hermann’s post on the Albino issue and the poor rate of fertility on an Albino to Albino breeding. Many questioned whether or not this would or could produce weaker offspring? Well, I would have to say with out a doubt yes. Those of you who are also bird breeders (as I once was too) can agree to some of this point. Many of the birds that show, what we call albino traits, are commonly warned not to breed together. Lutino Ringneck Parrots are not breed together (only hets) for fear of the birth defects it causes. White/redeyed Zebra finches are not bred together because it will produce blind birds, Albino Cockatiels are the same way.
It was just a few years ago that one eyed albinos were all too common (I even saw one for sale in the classifieds not too long ago). This was due to a inbreeding/over breeding problem. This discussion is covered about once per year and I remember last year someone posting a great article about the effects of human albinoism on the eyes. It seems very likely that the trait has some effect one the eyes, furthermore it is a defective trait in nature. A bright orange/yellow boa in the wild is not meant to survive very long or else there would be zillions of them. The fact that most (if not all) of the common Albino boas were bred from one animal ancestor should show you how shallow the gene pool really is for this morph. Who can be sure that along with the recessive albino gene that has been past to thousands of snakes, that there is not other negative traits that couple that gene line.
Although Hermann’s post may not be popular, it is indeed a very valid post and worth another visit. Now, whether or not it is proper to stat most of his opinion as fact is up to him and how strongly he believes in it. Please don’t not discount his thoughts just because you do not like the stance he takes on addition issues. I myself have a beautiful albino that I got from Tracy Barker, but it will only be bred to another het. I will do this because I too feel that breeding Albino to Albino is just asking for trouble.
I welcome your thoughts.
Jim Hopkins


