Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Anyone elso notice how the numbers just don't add up....

rodmalm Oct 20, 2004 03:35 PM

For instance, the Kerry's are worth over 1 billion dollars. Yet they only made 5 million last year? And they only paid 12% income on that?

Let's see, 1 billion put into a CD at 3% would yield them 30 million income from interest alone (plus then there is their business income from Heinz. Corp, etc.) People with over 1 billion dollars don't earn less than 0.5 % on their money! I'm not rich, and I make a much better return than that!--- without any financial advisors!

They are easily in the top 1% tax bracket, but they claimed less than 1/6 of what they could have easily made in interest, and they paid less than the average tax payer does. (a little over 14%) Most people making that kind of money are paying around 3 times as much.

I wonder why they won't release their entire tax forms.

Then there are the ridiculous social security claims. For instance, Kerry claimed in the debates that 14 trillion was needed for social security, and Bush's plan (to allow a voluntary 2-5% privatization) would result in a 2 trillion shortfall. Now, in a worse case scenario, if everyone opted into the plan at the maximum of 5%, just how does 5% of 14 trillion work out to be 2 trillion? A more realistic number would be 1/2 the population opting in at about 3%, or 1.5% of 14 trillion, or a short fall of about 210 billion. (about 1/10 of the Kerry claims.) Are they throwing out all these false claims hoping that the American public can't do simple math?

Do they think we are all like the guy, down at McDonalds, that can't figure out your change if you give him $10.30 for a $5.30 bill. LOL

Rodney

Replies (5)

repzoo44 Oct 20, 2004 03:57 PM

The numbers dont add up on either side.

EP
-----
Occupants not paying rent:
7 balls
2.1.10 corns(candy cane, creamsicle, ghost, 6 normal, 4 anery )
1 pueblan milk
1 everglades rat
1 cal. king
1 gray band king
1 w. hognose
1 bearded dragon
1 fish
1 mouse
3.3 cats

TallTex Oct 20, 2004 07:18 PM

I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately, I think that most Americans aren't going to take the time or effort to do the math...they just accept what they are told as being the truth. Sad but true. I don't think that anyone could listen to Kerry's ideas and, if they really put some thought into it, come out thinking that he has a plan that will work like he says. Nothing he says adds up or makes sense when applied to the real world. To top it off, he changes his opinion and stance so often that it is very difficult to pin down just WHAT his plan or opinion is.

rearfang Oct 21, 2004 06:32 AM

Ok...There's Kerry's tax figures....Bush's WMD count ...Kerry's war costs....Bush's trained Iraqi count....

Figures that add up? (Lol)I'm no mathematician but even I can see nothing really adds up here. They must get their statistics from the Palm Beach County board of Elections!

The truth in this election as been as accurate as Bush's service record.

Hi Rodney! You missed the best questions....

Why is it when Roe vs Wade was brought up Bush dodged the question twice-even when asked directly...While Kerry gave a definitive answer? (like it or not he was honest)

My favorite debate momment was when Bush claimed the sanctions weren't working in Iraq so we had to go to war...and Kerry pointed out that the fact that there were no WMD's proved that the sanctions were working!

What about that?

Frank
-----
"The luxury of not getting involved departed with the last lifeboat Skipper..."

rodmalm Oct 27, 2004 11:58 PM

Why is it when Roe vs Wade was brought up Bush dodged the question twice-even when asked directly...While Kerry gave a definitive answer? (like it or not he was honest)

My favorite debate momment was when Bush claimed the sanctions weren't working in Iraq so we had to go to war...and Kerry pointed out that the fact that there were no WMD's proved that the sanctions were working!

To the first question, it is obvious. He did answer it, but he did so in a way that showed how he would nominate judges based on their qualifications, not their political positions. His answer was to say he didn't have a litmus test, thus he wouldn't nominate supreme court judges based on the sole purpose of upholding or overturning Roe vs. Wade, while the democrats (Kerry) would have a litmus test, and only nominate those that held their political position on this subject, regardless of the potential nominees qualifications for the position.

To the second question, I liked that part too. It clearly showed that Bush knew what was going on and Kerry didn't. For instance, sanctions were put in place to put economic pressure on Iraq so they would comply with the UN resolutions. We now know that Iraq was selling it's oil at an extremely discounted price. That oil was being resold at the market price, and Saddam was getting 1/2 the profits from the resale. Iraq was also buying medical supplies at an increased price, in return for a kick back. These two things alone gave Saddam access to international money funds, which made the economic sanctions non-effective.---

Rodney

rearfang Oct 28, 2004 07:06 AM

np
-----
"The luxury of not getting involved departed with the last lifeboat Skipper..."

Site Tools