JD,
In cooperation with Dr. Glenn Stewart of Cal. Poly, Pomona, I preformed a field and laboratory study of the SRB in the San Bernardino Mts. from 1993-1997. The major area in which I made most captures was between Sky Forest and Running Springs and I believe the elevation was at or above 6000 ft. That seems to be a good place to start in any of the Mt. ranges in S. Calif. where the species in known to occur.
Because the extent of the SRB distribution in the San Bernardino Mts. has increased over time and the fact that there has not been a truly organized effort to determine it's exact distribution including elevation, one cannot say with any assurance at what elevation the species
may begin to show up. On the south facing slopes, my guess would be in the 5600 - 5800 ft. range in suitable habitat. On more protected north and northwest facing slopes in the Cedarpines Park area and northward where I don't believe any surveys for the species have been done, I suspect the species may occur at much lower elevations as good looking habitat extends well down those slopes to at least 5000 ft and perhaps lower towards Silverwood Lake. In 1980 and 1981 (perhaps 1982), Gary Keasler and other grad students under Dr. Stewart searched for the species and increased the distribution considerably. But they were not able to search all areas and since then, there have been range extensions at both the east and west extremes in those Mts.
If you were to make general searchers for all species that occur in those mts. and happened onto a SRB, that could not be considered as harassment. But as Phil C. mentions, the SRB is on the state's Threatened list although it shouldn't be. Existing data does not support such a listing. One of the reasons I undertook the SRB study as it has originally been classified as 'RARE' by the state's wildlife agency
and I was very skeptical of such a designation. The species as a whole over its entire distribution has always been considered as rare by many individuals including professional herpetologists. But that perception is completely erroneous and thus I felt that it was probably erroneous for the SRB as well. Simply by taking current data plus applying known principles of population ecology, the SRB has to be the most abundant snake in those mts. from about 6000 ft. on up in suitable habitat. The other two most common species are the S. Pac. Rattlesnake and Mt. Kingsnake, both larger species than the SRB and therefore quite likely to have lower densities and numerical abundance.
In the San Jacinto Mts., the species has been documented at somewhat lower elevations in and near Idyllwild than in the San Bernardino Mts. Far less is know about the San Jacinto boa population in that there are only 4 preserved specimens and no studies have been done on the SRB in those mts. In March, 2003 I proposed to do an identical study on the SRB in the San Jacinto Mts. and applied for a MOU (legal agreement) with the CDFG in order to study that population. My proposal has not been processed to date.
The species has never been documented south of the San Jacinto Mts. to the best of my knowledge. However, species are where one finds them and not where research papers, experts, and textbooks say they are. Science is a plastic process in which the best information is published at any given time but should not be inferred as being complete or etched in stone. Thus, in April 2002, Brad Alexander discovered the Rubber Boa occurs in the Scodie Mts. just east of the Piutes. Later that same month and year, with Brad, I found a male boa on Frazier Mts. Now Frazier Mt. is only about 50 - 60 miles from 13 million humans and yet the species had not been documented there until 2 years ago.
Richard F. Hoyer