Im in a state where Canebrakes are protected, and Timbers arent. This info straight from Fish and Game on the phone today. I am allowed 5 timbers, and NO canes under any conditions. I have a dilemma though. Im considering keeping some Timbers, and Im concerned that the inconsistency of different bodies lumping the 2 snakes together as one species, and others splitting them up is going to cause me some serious trouble. Obviously, Fish and Game seem to think they are 2 different animals. But what about other bodies of law Im subject to?
Im all about complying with the law, and only work in those means, even if just because I dont want to ruin the hobby for other people.
What reliable documentation can I get that will support me if I ever run into any trouble? How can someone prosecute me for having a "Canebrake" if it's a Timber?
I personally understand and believe in the difference of the 2 animals, but that doesnt exclude me from some one elses POV who has legal power to mess things up for me.
Any input or discussion is welcome. I love to pick peoples brains to see what they have to say.
Tom


