I guess this is kind of multiple questions/observations in one... I've been seeing bullsnake advertisements recently that have me scratching my head. A snake cannot be "het for Kingsville red" or "het for Crumbly line," correct? If one parent is a red bull, the offspring could be called 50% Kingsville/Crumbly, but *not* het, since neither Kingsville (a locale) nor Crumbly (a line-bred trait) are simple recessive traits. Did I get that right?
Along those same lines, by purchasing a "het" or 50% Stillwater hypo you will *never* be able to produce Stillwater hypos using that animal unless you're breeding it to another bull from the Stillwater area, correct? Hypos yes, but not Stillwaters. I guess I'm a little confused at what people are trying to accomplish. Are they simply introducing new blood to the line, or trying to create something new? To introduce new blood to the line, wouldn't you need to collect another bull from the Stillwater area?
Finally, what is the scoop on "golden" Stillwater hypos? How are they any different than the original Stillwater hypos that Ginter produces? I have always been under the assumption that "golden" was somewhat of a marketing tool to make the snakes sound more attractive. Please let me know if this is not correct, and there is more to a golden Stillwater hypo than simply having originated from Ginter's project. Animals from this bloodline *are* golden, and "golden Stillwater hypo" seems redundant.
I'm not trying to offend anyone or start a debate with the folks who may have posted ads similar to those I mentioned above. I simply want to understand the genetics better.
Thanks for your time,
Ronda

-----
Ronda Van Winkle
Northwest Herpetoculture


