I would start a new thread since it is way down and burried.
Paul,did you see it?He breeds hypo x hypo and not hypo x het?I don't know were kevin got that info?
Anyways,I still stand by my theory that he has two differant strains of hypos and they are both het for the other and compatible with one another,The problem is the only ones that look differant are the extreme (the dbl homo's).
Thats why I was saying that one of the normal hypos in his clutches may or may not be het?They would all be 66% het for the other(extreme).
So I would guess that if he took a male extreme and bred it to about four or five of his normal looking hypos from those clutches that one or two or maybe even more would prove out het?
Time will tell and to be honest I don't think we will learn much by outcrossing the extreme x any normal (i.e.wild type,anery,albino)because even if we did produce both hypos we wouldn't see a differance in either one so we would just chalk it up as (its just the one hypo gene?)
shannon
