Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for ZooMed
Click here to visit Classifieds

Review of a 2004 publication on UV lighting

jbly Nov 17, 2004 10:01 AM

I just read one of the best articles I've seen so far on UV lighting, funded by the Herpetological Society of Finland, and Hagen. Hagen Repti Glo and Life-Glo bulbs where included in the study but the results said they "cannot be recommended for use as UV lamps with a purpose to promote vitamin D3 photosynthesis in skin". It was published in Herpetomania (Herpetological Society of Finland).

The specific article is:
Lindgren, Jukka. 2004. UV-lamps for terrariums: Their spectral characteristics and efficiency in promoting vitamin D3 synthesis by UVB irradiation. Herpetomania. 13(3-4):13-20.

Its around 10 pages long, gives a nice description of the processes involved with natural vitamin D3 syntheses and compares 14 different bulbs. Unfortunately, the new compact lights and many of the Mercury Vapor bulbs are not evaluated. The one Mercury Vapor bulb evaluated was the Active UVHeat bulb which didn't perform as well as the regular linear fluorescent Zoo Med ReptiSun 5.0!

The study explains how comparing the whole UVB range from bulb to bulb, like we see many people doing in the US using less sophisticated UVB tools, is misleading because part of the UVB range helps skin create D3 and another part of the UVB spectrum destroys D3 in skin.

The approach used in this study is very good. The article mentions several ways to improve upon itself.

I was disappointed to see the UV Heat bulb do poorly because I currently use three types of mercury vapor bulbs in addition to ReptiSun 5.0 bulbs on my tortoises. It doesn't mean untested mercury vapor bulb types will do poorly, it just uncovers the need for a similar study to be done on them.

Quotes of particular interest from the article include:

"Vitamin D3 production takes place mainly in the wavelength range 295-300 nm, while the UVB range is generally specified 280-320 nm. This difference is significant especially at the top of the range, where vitamin D3 production ceases, but photodestruction by longer wavelength radiation still continues. This makes the use of UVB irradiance figure by itself a poor indicator of the effectiveness of the incident light in photosynthesising vitamin D3 in animal skin.
Use of the D3 Yield Index as a basis for evaluation of UV lamps gives a possibility to compare very different types of lamps with consistent criteria. The D3 Yield Index turns the attributes of a spectrum curve, that are otherwise difficult to compare, into an easily manageable and understandable form even for a novice keeper; they indicate with an unambiguous value the efficiency of a lamp to promote photosynthesis of vitamin D3 and by that, indirectly ensure sufficient level of calcium metabolism."

"Another sample that attracts attention in this group is Active UVHeat. The spectrum of this lamp is almost a pure line. In the wavelengths where radiation exists, it is very strong. In other areas radiation is at the same level as for the 14 W ReptiSun unit. There is only one single peak in the UVB-1 range, at 302-304 nm - this establishes the D3 Yield Index of this lamp at a reasonable level. However, its spectrum has another peak, over 10 times higher, at 313 nm and beyond that generally rather high irradiance values which may contribute to photodestruction of existing vitamin D3 in skin."

"Of all the lamps measured, the best contributor to vitamin D3 photosynthesis in skin is Zoo Med ReptiSun, with a D3 Yield Index of 439. This result can be considered especially noteworthy for the fact that the lamp in question is only a 14 W unit, while other units in the study have a nominal power of 30-40 W. The spectrum of ReptiSun begins very low in the UVB range and the spectrum curve rises steeply. In the most sensitive wavelength for vitamin D3 synthesis, 295 nm, for example, the radiation of ReptiSun is already 1.8 times stronger than that of the next best lamp."

Sources for getting this article include:
1. Herpetomania
2. The Chicago Herp Society plans to republish this article for the US audience next year in their bulletin, (www.chicagoherp.org).

Hope you find this useful,

jbly
25% Finnish
Tortoise Keeper

Replies (3)

EJ Nov 17, 2004 11:59 AM

The article looks interesting but this is the first I've heard (not saying much... I know) of a wavelength of UVB inhibiting D3 sythensis.

Something about the article just doesn't sound right either.

Dr. Gary Ferguson is probably THE man to talk to about this although most, if not all, of his research is done with Chameleons.

If you can dig up any of the papers he has written it might be interesting reading but will probably add to the confusion because you will see that there is no hard conclusion and this is another one of those 'depends' subjects. Keep in mind that Dr. Ferguson has been doing this research for more than 20 years now and if there is anyone who would know I would think he would.
-----
Ed
Tortoise_Keepers-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Trying to keep the fun in Chelonian care

jbly Nov 17, 2004 01:45 PM

Ed,
It's also a new concept for me. Actually it doesn't say "inhibiting D3 sythensis", it says destroy D3:

"The spectral characteristics of light in the UVB/UVA range are an important factor in vitamin D3 photosynthesis. While 7-DHC is sensitive to irradiation up to 315 nm, cutaneous vitamin D3 that has been photosynthesised or obtained nutritionally is destroyed by radiation up to 330 nm (Webb et. al., 1989.) This makes any radiation in the range 315-330 nm highly undesirable for the synthesis of vitamin D3."

The references is to: Webb, AR., DeCosta, BR., Holick, MF. 1989. Sunlight regulates the cutaneous production of vitamin D3 by causing its photodegradation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 68(5): 882-887.

I haven't read Webb's article but one assumption in this article is that D3 processes in reptile skin are similar to processes in human/other animal's skin.

More questions, but interesting.

jbly

CheriS Nov 18, 2004 10:51 PM

Interesting, but I would like to see the report, test control and full findings.

I also wonder if they did any 25-hydroxy serum level test and what those showed.... to me that is the ONLY way to really access what artificial or nautral UVB is doing and if it is doing the job properly.
-----
www.reptilerooms.com

Site Tools