First I want to adress Paul.... I'm sorry if you feel that I am adding to the confusion as that is not my intent at all.... I do however have to say that you should do a little more research on the different morphs/colorphases...... Snow dragons have never had clear nails.... They are the dragons that turned more white from the "hypo" line Kevin has been selling for years now. They also have never been known for having clear nials with the exception of one that he produced many years ago that was born almost solid white and I believe had all clear nails........ (that is the only "snow dragon" I know of that he produced with all clear nails) That is also the3 only info I have on that animal.... I don't even know if he actually bred it.
Mark LeShock did import the "leucistic" line first.... however, it was a line that didn't do well for whatever reasons and that is why you didn't see many of them around and they kinda didn't take off here in the states.... poor thrivers.... Kevin imported them again later and he has turned it into a heartier lbloodline and they are now becoming more well known. That is straight from Rob Dachius mouth in a phone conversation we had.
Sorry if that pisses you off Rob for using a quote from you... again not my intent....
Randy..... That wasn't directed at you alone and was not personal at all... I respect you as a peer and think you do a great job from what i can see. It was rather a generalization of how it seems that many people have made it very clear that they believe anything I say to be nonsense or that I'm not "qualified" to be adding to the "elite" ones conversations. Frankly I don't really care what anyone thinks about what I have to say because if I'm wrong... I will be the first to stand up and say so..... As far as stating opinions without proper research...... That article about the albino iggy.... That is hardly enough information to come to a conclusion about any beardie morph whatsoever. I'm also aware that you are working with the several different morphs and would like to add that I was working with the hypo/snow bloodlines.
You are of course aware that there are two seperate sets of melanophores.... one in the dermis and one in the epidermis.... Since the dermal melanophores aid in color and pattern developement wouldn't you say that since hypo/snows are well known for losing pattern, dropping color at around six to 10 weeks, or if they do hold color it usually faded or "washed out" and if the pattern stays it is also less than normal.... wouldn't that suggest a disfunction in the melanophores to you?
I agree that if it was an issue of only the color in the hypo/snows being characteristic of appearance it very well could go right along with the article you linked me too.... However there are several characteristics in play with this morph. As I said before, co-dom/inherited is really of no matter as we know that this defect is passed on to the next generation phenotypically speaking. I would suggest reading the chapter on chromatophore biology in Reptile and ASmphibian Variants by H. Bernard Bechtell.
Sean.... We already have a name system that is in place....... there are hypo/snows.... there are hypo-pastels........ there are marketed leucistics..... there are pastels...... there are reds... there are yellows...... etc....
Why change ANYTHING? There is no need.... Just because the originator of the morph may have misnamed it does not mean that we should change it..... DOing so will only create much more confusion than there already is.... I think everyone should stop being stubborn and get on the same page....... We are all in this together so why not make it easier on ourselves and those to follow us by just leaving what has been named, named just that.
Duncan... I think you have about the deepest understanding of anyone in this forum when it comes to genetics! i however, have to disagree with your theory that the lbredding Rob and Vicki did proves nothing. First of all.... the marketed leucistics do not have black or blue eyes..... That is characteristic for a lucy..... I fail to see how breeding to genetic morphs together could create a lucy as this is a seperate standing morph. WHen you breed an anerythristic boa to an albino and produce double hets then breed the babies to produce a snow you don't get a leucistic boa you get a new morph that they have named the "snow boa". Why would this change for beardies?
Some of this is just my opinion but much is factual information.... I think that the conclusions I have drawn from the facts i have gathered are fairly close to what is happening. However, I am human and humans of course are known to make mistakes........
Randy I apologize if I came across a little gruff in the other post but i am really more than a little ticked at how people are twisting everything..... There is going to be alot of inbreeding resulting from it if someone doesn't stand up and say something
Later guys,
Robert Wood
-----
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds,
adored by little statesmen, philosophers and divines.
Ralph Emerson





