You know, tc5000, I'm rather embarassed, as this IS my expertise and I'm afraid I can't really answer your questions with certainty. I am currently researching reptilian hibernation, using T.merianae as a model (mainly because my telemetry implants are so big that T.merianae is the largest reptile which I know of that hibernates AND that I could get a ready supply of and access to "field" research facilities). However, there is one thing that may somewhat answer your question semi-directly. Amongst hibernators, there are two main categories - facultative and obligative. Obligative hibernators are those animals that essentially have an internal clock that tells them it's time to hibernate, irregardless of ambient conditions. It's almost impossible to force such an animal into hibernation, but on the other hand, it will go into hibernation reliably on it's own when the time is right. The golden mantled ground squirrel (Spermophilus lateralis I think) is such a critter.
The other class, facultative hibernators, are those that appear to rely on zeitgeibers (external stimuli cues) to tell them it's time to hibernate. Without those zeitgeibers, they will continue on merrily being active. Tupinambis merianae is a facultative hibernator. It remains unclear what zeitgeibers T.merianae is cluing in on to determine time to enter hibernation. They certainly utilize light, but a change in light alone will not induce hibernation behaviour. They also cue in on temperature, however again, a change in temperature alone will not induce hibernation. It would appear that there is a complex interaction between these cues that T.merianae utilizes to determine hibernation time. Plus, it hasn't been ruled out that there could be other factors at play as well - drop in humidity, overall change in average atmospheric pressure, etc. So, yes, I would believe it would not take long for a South American Tupinambis spp. to acclimate to North American seasonal cycles.
BUT, and here's the kicker that really is confounding, in the wild, T.merianae show preparation for hibernation behaviour (reduction in appetite, fasting, nest building, etc.) long before ambient conditions such as temperature, humidity, photoperiod, resource availability, etc., fall outside the parameters of typical active season measurements. The only cue then that I think they could be using (but I'm very open to suggestions) isn't photoperiod itself, but the decreasing trend in photoperiod. I haven't tested this idea yet, but there's a certain potential flaw to that theory. In the subtropics, there really isn't that much change in photoperiod at all.