Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

ND Press x2: Bill bites keepers of venomous snakes

Jan 02, 2005 10:29 PM

BISMARK TRIBUNE (N Dakota) 31 December 04 Bill bites keepers of venomous snakes (Tom Rafferty)
A Bismarck legislator wants to make it illegal to possess venomous snakes, spiders and other creatures.
Rep. Margaret Sitte, R-Bismarck, said she is having a bill drafted in response to Bismarck police finding four deadly snakes in an apartment earlier this year.
Sitte said North Dakota law prohibits having skunks, raccoons and wolves, but not venomous animals. By putting the law in place, it would cover cities that don't have ordinances against venomous animals, as well as rural areas.
In July, Bismarck police found four poisonous snakes -- an East African green mamba, a death adder, an albino monocle cobra and a yellow-bellied racer -- in a Bismarck apartment.
Andrew Greff and Doug Feist were charged with misdemeanor reckless endangerment for having the snakes.
Greff was sentenced to one year with all but six months suspended for having the snakes, and Feist will go to trial on the reckless endangerment charge Jan. 6.
Greff told the Tribune earlier this year that he had purchased the snakes over the Internet and had them delivered via UPS.
Bismarck ordinances state that "the keeping of dangerous animals is prohibited."
According to the ordinance, "dangerous animals" means animals which, because of their poisonous bite or sting, their size, or their propensity to viciousness or aggressiveness, would constitute a hazard or threat to the safety of the citizens of Bismarck.
The ordinance has exceptions for educational, scientific or research purposes.
Although the bill would allow permits to be given for people keeping venomous animals for educational purposes, Sitte doesn't expect it to pass without a fight.
"It will be controversial because a lot of pet owners want to have them," Sitte said.
Sitte said a constituent asked her to introduce the bill.
The bill is in the process of being drafted, and she is still looking for co-sponsors. She said the bill will include venomous reptiles, arachnids and insects. There will be a special exemption for bees.
Sen. Ralph Kilzer, R-Bismarck, a co-sponsor, said the bill will make it a Class B misdemeanor to possess the animals included in the bill.
Sitte is working with Terry Lincoln, director of the Dakota Zoo, in how the bill should be worded. Lincoln said the zoo keeps some venomous spiders, but doesn't plan on having venomous snakes. However, Lincoln said he wants to make sure people can have venomous animals if they have a legitimate purpose for them.
Wording of the bill will be important.
Sitte said her bill initially included "poisonous" animals, but that had to be changed to read "venomous" animals.
Lincoln said some animals are poisonous, including the poison dart frog on display at the zoo, but they are not harmful unless they are eaten. A venomous animal is one that will bite, Lincoln said.
Although instances of people being caught with venomous animals are rare in North Dakota, Lincoln said it is surprising how many people have been bitten by venomous pets nationwide. "It's pretty incredible how many instances there are of people getting killed by these types of things."
http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2004/12/31/news/local/nws03.txt

KFYR (Bismark, N Dakota) 01 January 05 Bite Legislation
Bismark, N.D. (AP): A Bismarck legislator wants to make it illegal to have venomous animals and insects as pets. Representative Margaret Sitte says a constituent asked her to introduce the legislation. She says it's in response to Bismarck police finding four deadly snakes in an apartment in July. She says it's illegal in to have skunks, raccoons and wolves in North Dakota -- but not venomous creatures. Sitte says her bill would cover cities and rural areas that don't have ordinances against venomous animals and insects. She says the bill has an exemption for bees. North Dakota typically ranks near the top of the nation in honey production.
http://www.kfyr.com/cc-common/local_news_common.html?ID=20050101064004&feed=local

Replies (6)

McNasty78 Jan 02, 2005 11:18 PM

np

Chance Jan 03, 2005 03:45 PM

...it was just us 'liberal Democrats' pushing for new laws on pet ownership! LOL
-----
Chance Duncan
2.2 Retics (1.0 Tiger Het, 1.0 Lavender, 0.1 Dark Lavender, 0.1 Normal Het)
1.1 Olive Pythons
1.1 Ball Pythons (Het Albino)
http://www.rivervalleysnakes.com

Doug T Jan 03, 2005 08:16 PM

it was just us 'liberal Democrats' pushing for new laws on pet ownership! LOL

With anti-venomous laws in the works here in WA state, one of the groups that most wants this bill passed are the most Right-Wing types of all, Police Officers.

Sadly, these laws only keep hots out of the hands of law abiding types. Drug dealers will have no problem at all acquiring and using venomous snakes as the "Watch Dog" for their stash kept in a bag inside the snake cage.

Good luck guys,

Doug T

eunectes4 Jan 03, 2005 11:11 PM

The big stash is at someone elses house...its the money thats locked in the snake cages : )

LarryF Jan 04, 2005 01:41 AM

>>With anti-venomous laws in the works here in WA state, one of the groups that most wants this bill passed are the most Right-Wing types of all, Police Officers.

I wouldn't put too much stock in this comment unless you've surveyed them yourself. Frankly, I don't know that many cops, just the one working on her tiger permit at our refuge and the ones in the rifle clubs I shoot with when I get the chance. They seem to think that their views on both of the subjects tend to be misrepresented by their bosses (who are political appointees.)

eunectes4 Jan 03, 2005 11:03 PM

I think my little sister would disagree having just done a big research paper on it.

Site Tools