I would not say that the Harlequins have as strong as an influence on pattern abnormalities as Jungles *for the most part* (based on my own experiences) .
What I mean by this, is if you breed a Jungle to a common, the litter should contain half Jungles, right? Lets say a litter of 20 and 10 are Jungles. I would say 7 or 8 of those Jungles may have minor aberrancies, such as striped tails, but some aberrancy to speak for. Maybe the other 2 would be more aberrant and/or fully striped.
With a Harlequin litter, as mentioned before, breeding a Harley to a common will give you a full litter of Harlequins, and although there may not be as high as a percentage or ratio of pattern aberrant animals vs. non aberrant, there will be a few extremes.. such as full-blown Jungle-looking animals, and full stripers, besides 'commons' that look totally hypo, and high colored, clean animals.
I know Brendan Magee bred an F1 or F2 Harley to a Hypo, and in this outcrossed, F1 litter were 2 or 3 animals that looked like the most full-blown Jungle's you could ever see.
Considering all the traits they possess and produce, i'm shocked at how undervalued they are, and how they are not selling out.
When you consider what a really common (non extreme/non aberrant) Harlequin goes for, and that it can produce so much more (like others), I think it's a no brainer.. a great move.
Please take a look at some pics of some of my Harley's and Salmon Harley's posted in the Gallery!
Thanks, take care - Joe
(My group of Harley's were not aberrant, but here is a pic of the more aberrant of my group)

-----
Thanks and take care - Joe Rollo
'Tis not the stongest of the species that will eventually survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change' Charles Darwin