Guys and girls,
what all of you have said in your posts is partially right and should in my opinion be at least thought about in my opinion. Consider this:
1. The importation of wild caught reptiles into the country has been on a steady decline for the last 9 years.
Why? Simply most people have gotten the word that captive born and bred animals are less likely to have problems and make better long term pets. Which is where the majority of the animals are sold, into someones home as a pet.
2. Outside groups do use things such as this diatribe between people with different points of view against us as a herping comunity to further the goals and agenda they have which is usually not in the hobby's best interest.
Why? We make it easy for them to split us apart by simply trolling a loaded question. They usually get radical responses that sometimes are not well thought out as we are all so passionate about our herps.
3. Wild collecting is responsible for all of the different lines in the hobby and in itself should not be considered a bad thing. If we want long term viability of our captive animals new genetic pools are something we periodically need.
Why? If a natural resource such as reptiles is a renewable resource that the people in the country of origin can use to better themselves, then if monitored and regulated properly the value of the wildlife is understood and hopefully protected by the indigenous people. Over harvest is not the major problem that the animals face, but habitat destruction is. This destruction will only stop when the resources recieved from the land out produces the income from habitat degradation.
Bottom line to me is simply I try whenever possible to buy only captive bred and born animals. Additionally when I do buy wild caught animals I realize up front the pains and problems that come with them. There is indeed an increased cost in time, money and effort to get them to a point where they are good captives. If more people realized this they will be less and less demand for wild caught animals by the general public, even if they are cheaper at this time than captive born aimals. I hate even the concept of throw away pets.
I support the regulations that take an approach that is compatible in what is best for the wild populations, but not those that are knee jerk reactions from some legislative body that has no idea of any of the ramifications of a law he/she may pass. It is often much easier to just ban something than to put thought into writing comprehensive laws/regulations.
Involvement in the process as versus being viewed as loud mouthed mis-informed folks that cannot find common ground even within our own ranks is paramount.
A perect example of how you can make the process work for you is what happened here in Texas. Political groups here decided that private use of any indegenious wild life was a very bad thing and should be banned. On the surface this might appear to be a good thing for wild populations of animals, but when implemented there was going to be a complete ban of the SALE and collection of any wildlife within the state. A study group (of which I was a member) was set up and it was found that the animals that were being taken from the wild were NOT impacting the viability of the wild populations here in the state. Therefore it was recommended by the Texa Fish & Wildlife commision that the majority of the regulations be relaxed and collection etc. be allowed with periodic monitoring from the biologists. This makes sense and was a logical and reasonable approach to the problem.
Sorry for this being so long, but I hope everyone realizes the importance of finding common ground among differing opinions. The great thing about this internet stuff at least we can find each other now days, years ago we were all isolated and easy targets for some of our detractors such as the current program of mis-information being put out byt the SPCA.
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms
Cherryville Farms - Reptiles