Hi Kurt,
no, I have not yet worked with standingis.
But with respect to inbreeding. Sometimes it helps to have a PhD in Biology and so I have done quite some homeworking on this subject.
Its a fact that inbreeding lowers allelic variety. Thats undisputable, OK. But sometiems this ends up in finding a balance between wanted and unwanted effects of this outcome.
Inbreeding can be very detrimental to one species and comnpeltely harmless for another. That very likely depends on the temporal distance to the last population bottleneck of the respective species.
If that is long ago, a high degree of heterozygosity has accumulated in the populations of question. If not, the degree of heterozygotism can bemuch lower and the frequency of potentially detrimetal allelic variants can be very low.
There are many examples out there: Look at all these millions of goldhamstzers, which originate from the litter of a singel female importes approx 50 yeas ago. Look at all the budgies and beardies-all result of excessive inbreeding.
All these are species which obviously are highly resistant against inbreeding depressions.
On the other hand, many aquarium populations of Cichlid and Characid fish vanished after a few generations of unavoidable inbreeding and from expereince with chameleons I may conclude that many Chamaeleo species are quite sensitive gainst inbreeding.
But with careful selection of breeder animals, chosing only strong and apparently healthy individuals, serious breeders in many cases can overcome the negative aspects of inbreeding-just look at the veiled chameleons: So many people do report inbreeding problems-but with carefully selected breeder specimens you easily produce strong and healthy offspring.
And longevity? Of course, its almost impossible to select for that-animals do breed before they die.
But if you have a close eye on health of the animals you choose for breeding, you in most cases end up with long living specimens.
And with respect to grandis: At least for my strain, I do not see any detrimental inbreeding effects. Neither do I observe reduced hatch rates nor do strange colour variants pop up and egg production doe snot go down, but increases.
Having had males which make females look poor and ugly and full of mating scars after only a few years of breeding, I felt the need to select for less harsh mating behaviour.
In the wild grandis may live some 4-6 years. In captivity they can accumulate mating scars over decades. So it makes sense to reduce the frequency of injuries during mating. That was my original aim. On the way I found out that females coming out of this project turned out to be less agressive at well and I then had a close eye on them. With interesting specimens I mostly do back-crosses with one parent and also mate them to siblings originating fromn the other parent and a less related animal. I have best experiences with this procedure.
And to my opinion group raising is important as well. Animals get used to the presence of their own kind and even though most of theirt behaviour is inborn, they have the opportunity to practice intraspecific communication.
Its a highly unnatural situation that a lizard grows up without ever meeting others of its kind.
Of course, you need to have a closer eye on these groupos than on the single animal. Extraordinaryliy agressive specimens have to be sorted out quickly-but the result is worth the effort.
Just my 2 cts
Ci@o
Ingo