Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Bearded Genetics discussion. (also posted on the bearded genetics forum)

apexpredator01 Mar 10, 2005 08:03 PM

Ok, I've been breeding beardeds since some of the first ones appeared in US collections in 1990. So don't think I'm a newbey who doesn't have a clue. I have a few things that I'd like to see cleared up when it comes to genetics and beardeds.

First of all, terminology. There is NO SUCH THING as a Leucistic Bearded Dragon!!! Fire your arrows if you must but the animal doesn't exist that I've seen and I've seen a TON of bearded dragons. A TRUE leucistic would be PAGE WHITE!!! With NO PATTERN what so ever!!! It would have either blue or black eyes as well!!

Next, are there any PROVEN recessive traits in bearded dragons? Can you breed a sandfire to a normal and get a Heterozygous for Sandfire? NO! You get an animal that is part way between both. Not quite as red as the sandfire, but more red than a normal.

I have seen the photos of the Amelanistic beardeds from Australia and according to some good contacts those have proven to be a true recessive. That to my knowledge is the first TRUELY recessive trait in beardeds.

If anybody has an CONCRETE Documented SCIENTIFIC proof to dispel what I've just said, feel free to post it.

Let the flaming, begin!

Replies (12)

heartmountain Mar 10, 2005 10:09 PM

Leucistics have their problems, first off being that they're not leucistic, but ignoring the name it is a simple recessive trait. Other simple recessive traits include clear nails, translucent, and albino (now we just need them to get to the states). Granted there hasn't been as much research done on beardies as say more expensive BP's. I can't tell you which allele certain traits reside on or anything like that but we're starting to get some good info (mixed with bad unfortunately) and given some time it'll be figured out.

Sean
-----
Heart Mountain Herps

apexpredator01 Mar 11, 2005 01:04 AM

We need to STOP the stupidity! I say we make a concerted effort to tell people that there IS no such thing as a Leucistic! Leucistic is a biological term that refers to a specific mutation!

The "Hypo" term is thrown around rather cavalierly in beardeds as well. I believe that is bogus too! Hypomelanism is a specific scientific term that describes a specific mutation. It is not a term that is to be thrown around willy nilly! If you want to coin a phrase to describe a particularly light dragon with a reduced pattern, call it a Dusky, or hyper light, anything, but don't use biological terms to reflect your emotions about your dragons.

In short, KNOW your genetics before you start throwing out names and descriptions.

Who has proven the so called "leucistic" trait? And what qualifies as a so called "leucistic" in bearded dragon circles? I produce hundreds if not thousands of dragons every year that end up very light and almost pattern less as adults. I don't believe this is a recessive trait at all. It comes from breeding the lightest dragons to the lightest dragons. The same is true for the red types of dragons. You breed the reddest, to the reddest, over numerous generations and you get consistently more red dragons. Is it recessive? NO! It's a simple fact of genetics and variation in offspring. There will be some that have more red than their parents, and some with less. You take the ones with more, and breed them together and some of their offspring will have more. And so on...

The REAL question here is this. Is there anybody here who can HONESTLY say that these "reddest" or "lightest" of dragons don't have a family tree that looks like tapering bamboo shoot? Or something like a genealogy chart from a character from "Deliverance"?

skmcwilliams Mar 11, 2005 09:05 AM

Wow someone needs some more coffee this morning...LOL, really though you are 100% correct that Leucistics aren't Leucistics. They are now thought as "marketed" leucistics. This leucistic name was stated by Kevin at Dragons Den. I do know that when you do breed 100% "marketed" leucistics approx. a quartere will come out very much lighter with clear nails. So in my opinion this makes them different than the regualr hypos that are out there. They should have been given another name like clear nailed super hypos or something similar but unfortunately that didn't happen. I think the translucents are the next big genetic thing for Bearedes. I plan to breed my "marketed" leucistic male to a translucent female this summer. I hope in time to have a white translucent. I wonder in time if that could make the first real Leucistic?

apexpredator01 Mar 11, 2005 09:18 AM

You can't "Make" a lucistic.

So your telling me that if you breed a "Marketed as leucistic" dragon to a normal, you will get het for "Marketed as leucistic"? And that if you breed those offspring together you will get half "MaL" and half "Het for MaL"?

And there you go throwning the "hypo" word around like it doesn't have a true meaning.

Lets just face it people. In bearded dragons we just have a bunch of selectively bred for traits. And very few, recessive mutations that have accidently popped up during the years of captive breeding. The reason for this is lack of new blood to be brought into the trade.

Mystical-dragons Mar 11, 2005 10:47 AM

Yes, if you breed a marketed leucistic to a normal dragon you will get hets that will if bred to another het or marketed leucistic create more marketed leucistic dragons.

Marketed leucistics are hypomelanistic dragons. Hypomelanism has in fact been proven many times over by numerous breeders to be a recessive trait.. Believe it or not.

There are clear nailed hypo's or a clear nail trait that leucistics and hypo pastels both have which makes it easy to see through breeding trials that there is a recessive trait involved. Hets will not have clear nails, but if you breed hets you will get some clear nailed offspring which will be the "market leucistic" hypo offspring. Some people think the clear nailed dragons are the "real deal" hypomelanistic dragons, and some people still classify snows which do not carry the clear nailed trait as hypomelanistic. Makes it a bit confusing, but their are a few traits that are recessive.. clear nailed dragons (leucistic, hypo pastel), translucent, and (you seem more sure of this then me) possibly the albinos in Australia. I wouldn't see why albino wouldn't be in dragons as it is in other reptiles.

Snow dragons which originally were called hypo are suspect by some to be just a hereditary trait or color.. Basically breeding light to light, so on and so forth for many years. Some people believe there is more to them then that which because it is not recessive will be very hard to decifer if there is anything more.
-----

Mystical-Dragons Web Site
Webshots photos

skmcwilliams Mar 11, 2005 11:45 AM

You came here wanting a genetic discussion, so don't start getting nasty just because peoples views differ from your precious own. You must not have done all your homework to have missed that YES "marketed" leucistic do make hets. And YES hypos are out there so I will throw the term around becuase it's true. Get a grip.

skmcwilliams Mar 11, 2005 11:56 AM

You can't "Make" a lucistic

HMMMMM. An all white bearded with black eyes sounds like a leucy to me. You don't have any clue what the genetic make up is in a "marketed" leucistic or a translucent and neither do I, it would take sending a blood sample to be analyzed by a gentetics team and that would take more money than most people could spend. So it'a all a trial and error to see what results are given when breeding. You are a little to quick to judge and dismiss. Go back to breeding your normals and then you don't have to worry about it.

Kendra McWilliams

InTheBlue Mar 11, 2005 12:05 PM

Kendra,

Even though I agree with you I have to say that I think this person is just a web troll looking for reaction and not knowledge or truth. They would approach the discussion differantly if they were.

This is very similar to one person inparticular that posts here in the way they come across and "aggressively" give everyone the finger if a differing opinion comes along.

Another thing that gets me is that he says we are throwing these terms around loosely but we are only calling these traits what they have been named by the people who originated the lines... ROFLMAO.... Someone deffinately didn't do their homework or are just stirring up poop... I'm done with this thread...

Later gang,
Robert
-----
Great spirits have always been recieved with violent opposition by mediocre minds. Albert Einstein

skmcwilliams Mar 11, 2005 12:09 PM

I agree with your Robert 100%

I shouldn't have tried to argue but it's been one of those days already and so I took the bait. Oh well that's part of forums I guess.

Kendra McWilliams

InTheBlue Mar 11, 2005 11:48 AM

First I'd like to say that it is very easy to create a nickname and come in here to stir up poop... Posting your name would possibly give your claims of knowing what you speak of some clout. However, I question your motives and your identity... but then again I'm a paranoid type person and think that everyone to some extent is "genetically evil".

Aside from that your claims don't really seem to have any "scientific" background either. So why judge others for the same thing your doing? and to add to that, most of the genetic posts I've seen about beardies have someones name attached to them.... If you produce hundreds of beardies a year surely posting your name would put some wieght to your posts.... Wouldn't it?

Is the hypomelanistic trait recessive? YES. it's been proven. Is there more than one form of hypomelanism? Possibly... There are two forms of anerythrism in a species of boa. There are also two forms of albinism in every species of reptile or at least it's possible. Since there are two layers of skin with the melanophores in each completely seperate from one another and not dependant on the other for anything... Is it possible that there could be two forms of hypomelanism in beardies? YES.

On top of the proven breedings that are used when speaking of these traits look at the way the differant genetic defects mannifest species to species. Point of fact, the blue eyed lucy ball pythons. WOW is all I can say. The blackeyed lucy balls breed completely differant. SAME trait differant gentic makeup and they are passed on differantly. True the trait is easily visualized making it much easier to determine recessive, dominate, co-dominate.... But that doesn't mean that hypo/snow lines are not genetic or will be rough to prove out... someone just has to take the time to do so.

The one thing I do agree with you on is that if you think you have found a new genetic trait for ANY species.. before tagging a biological name on it and marketing it as such you should have SOLID proof that is what you have. Especially if your making several hundred thousand dollars on it.

So now that I'm standing downwind and in the path of the fire.... LOL...

Later,
Robert
-----
Great spirits have always been recieved with violent opposition by mediocre minds. Albert Einstein

apexpredator01 Mar 11, 2005 02:50 PM

Robert,
You agree with me on the most important points of my argument, which is the proper use of scientific terminology when representing the animals.

As for the clear nail hypo discussion I'd have to see someone’s breeding records, which very few bearded dragon producers seem to keep.

One of my biggest difficulties with the bearded dragon breeding circles is the folks that are soo quick to claim a genetic mutation when actually it's just a phenotypic thing.

Wouldn't you all agree that someone should be certain of a mutation before flonting it as the next biological bearded revolution?

I know I came on a bit strong, but sometimes you have to stomp on a pile of crap to get the attention of all.

Hope I didn't twist anybodies head off.

ecreipeoj Mar 12, 2005 12:03 PM

Well, you certainly got your point across. I am very involved with the breeding of Corn Snakes and proving out their genetics. When I decided to get into Dragons, I was amazed at how little most Dragon people know about their Dragons genetically. Nobody could give me the answers that I was use to in the Corn Snake, Boa and Ball Worlds. You must have never seen a Translucent or Clear Nail Hypo. They are obviously true mutations. The Clear Nails have very distinctive opaque bluish/purple colorations in place of the dark pigment, just like in other hypo reptiles and clear nails. The Translucents are obviously missing something. Most believe it is their white coloration or what ever causes the white in Dragons.

There are some very obvious mutant genes in Dragons, contrary to what you believe. One of the biggest areas of my confusion was the hypomelanistic Dragons. There definitely are a few hypo genes in Dragons. Some people try to say that the Clear Nails are the only “True” Hypo gene which is a crock. In Corn Snakes we have four hypo genes that have been proven to be incompatible. They are all hypo genes. We also have four different anerythristic type genes that are proven to be completely different genetically.

It seems extremely likely that there are multiple hypo gene in Dragons. The Snows and Hypo, may be one and the same thing. The Clear Nails is a hypo gene that seems to be different than the Snows. The problem in Dragons is that the genes have been very mixed up and breeding results are very inconclusive. It is also very possible that there are anery genes in Dragons and a Snow may very well be homo for Anery and hypo, and the Marketed Leucistics be homo for Anery and Clear nail or something to that effect.

You are totally right about the Leucistic Dragons. The name is incorrectly being used and it should stop immediately. There are just too many leucistic mutations in other reptiles that are constantly pure white with no pattern at all, to even begin to think that the “Marketed” Leucistics are the same type of mutation. They are nothing more than a new hypo Dragon that is very likely different than the previous hypo type genes.

I do understand your point about selective breeding that can definitely change a Dragons color to red or yellow or much lighter in coloration, but it is also possible and very likely that there are some co-dominant genes at work in the extreme reds and yellow dragons that we see. Some of the lighter Dragons or even some of the hypo ones could actually be co-dominant rather than recessive. A co-dominant gene is a mutation just like recessive genes are, but are inherited differently.

Generally, with a co-dominant color mutation, there is a lot of selective breeding that goes along with the gene. It does seem as if, many of the colors in Dragons have more to them than just selective breeding. I have seen clutch mates that are clearly only yellow or only red. I am sure this is possible with normal genes when mixing a yellow and red Dragon together, but the separation is very distinct and does seem to have more to it than you think. IF some of the yellows and reds are co-dominant, if you bred a het red/yellow x same together, your would get some yellow, red, normal and some “Super” Reds and “Super Yellows. These last two would be homo for the two mutations. The problem with co-dominant genes is they are co- dominant to normal and the het offspring can vary from almost normal to almost mutant looking. It is very difficult to determine if we are just talking about normal selective breeding of normal genes or a mutant co-dominant gene.
-----
Joe Pierce
Snakes Alive!
"Home of the guaranteed feeders"
"If it won't eat, it is not worth a dime!"

Site Tools