Exactly what I was thinking too, which is why I posted this snake on here in the first place.
It is a confusing, but wonderful species to work with: (When breeding goinis) it's like Forest Gump once said: It's like a box of chocolates; You never know what you're going to get, LOL!
Thanks for the info, Sean! (Now, if I could just get a male,LOL!!!)
I agree (about the confusing part). But when you really look at this population, I think you can tell which specimens are more pure by how much interband lightening they have, how wide the bands are, and the ventral scales. It's obvious which ones have more of an Eastern influence but then again, what is the pure thing? Kenney Krysko's paper in which he names this population after Bruce Means has not been published yet (that I know) so I for one am eager to see what he describes as the pure thing. I would definitely say the patternless and striped forms are pure but I find it hard to tell which blotched specimens would be considered pure or not. Either way, definitely an interesting species to work with and one that I will continue to search for and learn as much as I can about.