The comment that I made about naming traits was clearly erroneous and not what I meant to say at all. Having consistant ways to name different color patterns is clearly important even if the trait is not genetically predictable. What I meant was that naming this trait was not the question I was asking. What I wanted to know was more about the inheritability of this trait.
As for the high whites issue. Originally when high whites were first coming onto the scene there were no perfect screamers that had no black at all, it was a slow selective proccess to get to the quality of high white animals that exist today. But the fact is that many (not the really good ones but most) high white cal kings still have traces of black on them. In the few bloodlines that I have worked with, I have noticed that the black is usually close to the spine especially at the neck and tail. (but you are right, I should have said most, not all) Sometimes I have seen animals that had black along the sides of the body (where the bely scutes meet the doral scales) and occasionally I got snakes that have the black randomly possitioned all over.
Clearly there is some variance within the trait. Breeding high white animals doesn't give you a litter of even whiter ones, but if you want really high whites you breed the whitest anmals around and hope to get a few that are even nicer.
The point I was trying to make, which I think you agree with, is that the snakes in the pictures above are nice normal high white animals but not spotted. Thats just how high white animals with black on them look.
As far as the gentics I have some questions. I have not been breeding cal kings for very long nor am I an expert on the inheritability of different patterns etc., but I am a genetics student and I have noticed a few things within my collection that make me question some of your statements.
***Both striped cal kings and spotted cal kings ARE NOT RECESSIVE GENES.***
For example I had two unrelated perfectly banded, black and white kings (unknown local) that both came from breeding 1 banded parent to 1 striped one. When bred together they prduced mostly bandeds, a few perfect stripes, and rarely an aberant looking one. Since both banded parents had one striped parent themselves, and then they throw a small percentage of striped offspring, In my mind that would make them het for stripe. Unfortunately I lost the records that I kept of this pair and I can't tell you what the exact proportions of the different patern types were.
Now maybe this trait isn't SIMPLE recessive, so you can't just work out a 4x4 punet square and predict all of your offspring. But the trait has to be recessive to some degree because both parents are banded yet they have striped babies sometimes. The genes have to be there somewhere, recessive just means that the parents don't have to show the phenotype.
Again I do not have extensive experiance with high white bloodlines but it would seem to me that if FR got those snakes above from parents that were not high white animals then there are only two explainations. Either the trait is somewhat recessive or FR has spontaneously found a new mutation that codes for high white animals.
So, now having never bred spotted animals before I have no idea what to expect from this trait. Do you think that if I bought a renegade spotted male to breed to the below female that they would throw some spotted offspring, or do you think that the babies would have random paterns all over the place??
I didn't mean to step on any toes with the last post, admittedly it was quickly and carelessly written. Sorry.