>>I am looking to either purchase or make a rack system for my colubrids with Flexwatt. Which type of mounting is more effective; back or belly?
Belly heat is more efficient, but not because heat rises. In fact only convective heat rises and it is nearly impossible to create a convective current in a typical rack setup.
Flexwatt produces radiant heat which moves in a straight line parallel from it's source until is is reflected or absorbed. In a typical rack setup with belly heat that means either up & into the box or down into the shelf below. In the latter case, that simply means the shelf is heated up and becomes a secondary radiator for the heat source, in other words there is more thermal mass.
Also, in a typical rack w/belly-heat setup, a large portion of the box is heated up which also increases the thermal mass.
With back heat the heat either moves into the back of the tubs or escapes out of the back of the rack. Also, with back heat there is less thermal mass to be heated up.
However, thermal mass can be increased and the back of racks can be covered with reflective insulation, both of which duplicate or even improve on some of the advantages of belly heat.
Which begs the question if there is any advantage to back heat?
In my opinion, yes. In a cold room it can be very difficult to create a proper thermal gradiant without flexwatt needing to reach very high surface temperatures. This holds true whether back or belly heat is used.
The one advantage of back heat over belly heat is that it is very rare for any surface of the tub to reach uncomfortable or even dangerous temperatures. This is actually pretty common with belly heat. One exception is the heating design of the new Vision racks which are just really, really slick. As far as I know it's not been duplicated in any other commerical rack. But its merits would be hard to duplicate in a DIY rack.
With belly heat if you set the Tstat probe to control the hot spot the opposite end of the tub often does not get warm enough. Conversely, if you set the Tstat probe to control the cool end then the hot spot can become dangerous for the snake. At least in cool rooms.
Also, back heat is less susceptible to heating accidents that can arise from accidental or forgetful shifts in the placement of the Tstat probe.
Lastly, I'll comment that the most efficient way to heat a home is with radiant heat sources either mounted on the ceilings or upper walls of a home. If belly heat were more efficient then we would expect floor radiant heat to be more efficient in homes. Yet, it is not. Now there are many reasons for this that I won't get into, but its still interesting information.
>> ... basement they are in is 65-69degrees so I neem to make sure they have a sufficient hot side.
How many racks/snakes will you be keeping? How large will the basement room be where the rack(s) will be maintained?
It may actually be prudent for you to heat the room, at least slightly. Remember that room heat is more efficient if you have a medium to large collection. I used to keep the equivalent of sixteen, 25 gallon tanks in a 7'x7'x8' room. Without heat I would have need about one 60 watt bulb per tanks, or about 960 watts.
But with my oil-filled radiator heater set at 600 watts I was able to heat the entire room. And the heater rarely had to run to heat that small of a room. I only needed small amounts of supplemental heat for each cage, not 60 watts. And I could have kept a heck of a lot more than 16 tanks in the room.
>>btw, does anyone have any rack plans or know where I can find them. I would use 28-32qt containers.
I always recommend finegtps.com and arbreptiles.com. Between the two you should be able to come up with a design that works for you.
-----
Current snakes:
1.1 Gonyosoma oxycephala - (Silver/Yellow)
2.2 Gonyosoma oxycephala - (Green)
4.3 Gonyosoma janseni - (Black)