>"......if he continuously makes appearances and is found in >that yard which is the other side of the fence (at least it >was possible until the new cinderblock fence was put in this >past spring), please pray tell how you can possibly make the >claim that he's "never" lived there??? That yard is part of >his natural territory or else he would not be hanging around >that area in the first place."
"pray tell"...you like to use that quite a bit when you are condescendingly berating people on other forums don't you? Your presence here is no surprise.
I never claimed emphatically, he "never" lived there. I said "if" [he never lived there]. And "natural territory" is a fuzzy and vague substitute for the words "range distribution" or "home range".
take exception all you want. Attempt to badger me with your >irate comments all you want - I don't care. I will present my >opinions as I see fit based on information that is available >to me and which I believe to be factual. Really, these forums >are for discussion. You can't be taking offense at anyone who >chooses to present an opinion that is different from your own >or else there is no discussion taking place."
you are imprecise, which makes for difficult rational discussion. "take exception" does not mean "take offense". When I take "offense", I will tell you so.
In addition, I stated "exception" was taken to your "information", not the fact that you posted an opinion. You are conducting yourself pretty fast and loose where it concerns content and context. Please refrain from using similes and synonyms when you are quoting me. It's inaccurate and rude.
differing with your opinion is hardly irate or badgering.
>a wandering turtle does not establish a territory and stay >within it... they wander and don't look back - not setup shop. >Hobo by the fact that he does keep coming back means he's not >a wanderer. He's staying within an established territory that >he is familiar with - not going off into areas unknown and not >ever likely to come back through that area.
>As for where I am coming from... why don't you check out some >of the research that's been done on the subject. For example: >Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (based in Maryland) does box >turtle studies and they have one of the longest-running mark >and release and tracking/population research projects >in .the .country...going back to 1944. They are a part of the >US Geological Survey. They are known for top quality wildlife >studies. They even have captive breed and release of >endangered species programs such as the whooping cranes.
I have "checked out" such research...and you are irresponsibly using reference data which pertains not a bit to the species Terrapene ornate luteola.
"pray tell"....where might Patuxent be? In Maryland? Do they currently have any Terrapene ornate luteola range in that area? I think not. You are citing studies from a completely different species which does not even occur on that side of the country!
>Additionally, perhaps you should obtain a copy of the >following book - one of the best to date on the natural >history of box turtles. It's quite good reading.
>North American Box Turtles: A Natural History
>C. Kenneth Dodd, Jr.
>University of Oklahoma Press, 2001
>ISBN 0806132949
>If you don't want to purchase the expensive but nicer hardback >binding edition, there is a cheaper softbound edition >available.
>DP
I have many nice books, but thank you. Perhaps I could suggest a course in scientific method and proper use of references? 
Mick
-----
"When tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign foe."
James Madison