what we need is some uniformity across the states dealing with the keeping and handling of venomous reptiles. Hopefully they would model it after Florida where a citizen can at least apply for and obtain a permit if they meet the guidelines.
It would also be helpfull to have the definition of "domestic" or "lab animal" defined with regard to reptiles and amphibians that have been reproduced in captivity for many many many generations!! F30+
Another point is for states such as Colorado, that do not recognize subspecies of non-venomous or venomous species. Additionally all venomous are against the state law to "keep" (except for the Gila and Beaded Lizards). Without an avenue to barter (ship out of state) captive bred subspecies of hognose, milksnakes or "illegally reproduced venomous" of a subspecies not occurring in Colorado, the chance of releasing the juveniles into the wild to mingle with the other wild ones becomes more attractive. Imagine the authorities mixing up a milk snake from central or south america that is 5 ft. plus with the native milksnake found in Colorado and calling it the same snake!!! All C.viridus from any population if your tired of it can be safely released since they have been redefined as a single species by the state!
Maybe they just need a lesson in who is paying the taxes that keep them employed and in a house etc.
Just making a point but think about the ramifications of what these state "biologists" are attempting to control.