I am not trying to start a flame war and I completely respect your opinion, but I as well have mine. With this particular comment I certainly DONOT disagree. I agree that breeders, dealers or pet shops should properly educate customers as well as refuse sells if they donot feel that the animal will be properly taken care of and/or the potential purchaser does not seem like they will provide a permanent home for the animal. However, that is NOT what you said previously. You made the comment that ONLY breeders should be allowed to keep and maintain these animals and should be kept out of private hands. A good majority of breeders are private keepers themselves. Furthermore, if that was the case then what will be done with all of the offspring? Zoos certainly aren't going to take that many. Breeders are only going to keep so many animals. Conservation only goes so far and breeding "high-end" (aka money making) retics cannot and should not be considered "conservation", because they are there for breeders to make a profit. So if private keepers should NOT be allowed to keep and maintain these animals, then why do people continue to breed them??
Like I said, I am not trying to start a flame-war and I am not "percieving" your comments to my liking/disliking. I am simply trying to state where I feel that your comments were a bit flawed. Thanks for reading.
Best wishes,
Chris
>>Not really, I just mean that it is the responsibility of a breeder, dealer, or pet shop to educate costumers on the animal they are buying. People that buy a snake like that and are unprepared to accommodate its needs when it is big and some one ends up getting hurt is the reason why the legislature on these animals is becoming ever more ridiculous! Remember, this is my opinion you can perceive this any way you like.
>>
>>Thanks, Prairie State Exotics