>>It's any mix of several strains of "good" bacteria - the brand
>>I have is Nutribac which about six kinds.
From what I understand, the intentions of the products appear to be well and good, but the benefits and practicality of the delivery method aren't entirely well understood nor are the contents of the vial. There's some sparse information that's available on the net regarding these things if your up for the search, and I'm highly favoring the side of skepticism.
With the human dietary supplement market being the controversial deceptive unregulated thievery it is, I can't put a whole lot of confidence in what's delivered as a pet product of equal caliber. If this were a veterinary product that had both been tested, researched, FDA approved, and the contents regulated/guaranteed, I might not speak so sharply.
>>It's something that I can't guarantee will help, but it can't
>>hurt, either!
Unfortunately, I can't agree with that statement. The whole supplements industry seems to thrive under this notion. I've met many people who blindly consider that anything promoted as natural is harmless while things synthesized or refined are inherently dangerous, which can't be farther from the truth.
I tried this specific product out on some otherwise healthy and thriving animals only for them to get the [bleep]s following introduction.
-----
2.3.0 uromastyx geyri (Saharan/Nigerian)
0.0.4 uromastyx hardwickii (Indian)
3.6.0 uromastyx macfadyeni (Somalian)
1.2.0 uromastyx ocellata (Sudanese)
1.3.0 uromastyx ornata (Ornate)
1.0.0 uromastyx benti pseudophilbyi