Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research

HET for tiger???

RuHigh Aug 14, 2005 09:39 PM

Am I right in thinking you can't have a het for tiger? I thought the tiger was het for supper tiger, right?

Just want to make sure I'm thinking right.

Thanks

Replies (7)

h_and_jreptiles Aug 14, 2005 11:04 PM

no there is no het for tigers the tiger trait is a co-dominate gene
meaning the offspring will show the trait in the first generation and a tiger isnt het for a super tiger either.. the super tiger trait is the homozygous form of the tiger trait.

RuHigh Aug 15, 2005 04:24 AM

Yea thats kinda what I thought, a tiger is the heterozygous, and the supper is the homozygous form of the tiger gene.

Just wanted to make sure there wasn't some kind of new recessive tiger retic, out there that I didn't know about.

Thanks

Steve_Ray Aug 15, 2005 08:23 AM

Usually when you hear someone refer to their "Tiger Het," it means the tiger is het for albino.
-----
-Steve Ray

RuHigh Aug 15, 2005 09:55 AM

Yea, that I did know.

No this is about an add from someone who I know knows better. He has a retic listed as a double het for albino AND tiger. He says it a few times in the ad. I'm not going to name names here as I don't want this post pulled, but he is a "good guy" and I know for a fact he knows better.

anyway thanks

h_and_jreptiles Aug 15, 2005 10:50 AM

a dh retic? well the albinism trait is a dominate trait dominate genes are shown is second generation offspring..
the tiger trait is co-dominate and with co-dominate genes the gene carriers show the trait in first generation. IF THEY DONT SHOW IT THEY DONT HAVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chance Aug 15, 2005 11:23 AM

The person with that ad does call the snake a double het tiger and albino, and I was wondering about that myself. My suspicion though is that he had a momentary lapse in thought, because if you look at the picture, the animal is a tiger. So he's not trying to sell a normal retic as het for tiger and albino, he just misworded or was thinking along the wrong lines.

And for the previous poster, the gene for albinism is actually recessive, which explains why it is "masked" when an animal carries it along with a normal gene. If it were dominant, a het animal would appear albino and carry the masked gene for normal.
-----
Chance Duncan
www.rivervalleyexotics.com

h_and_jreptiles Aug 15, 2005 11:31 AM

"And for the previous poster, the gene for albinism is actually recessive, which explains why it is "masked" when an animal carries it along with a normal gene. If it were dominant, a het animal would appear albino and carry the masked gene for normal."
-----

o.k. well you guys got the point lol im a work in progress..
thanks for clearing it up.

Site Tools