Tharyi come in hundreds of colors and to think they are suppose to come out resembling the parents is naive. If you have an extreme expressed trait, like a super lite one. The simple chances of recieving another is extremely rare, when outbreeding. Of course you will recieve intermediates. And with tharyi, individuals you had no idea would occur.
In order to understand what your recieving, you must know the exact history. In this case its not an ontogenetic change, Black tharyi are born black tharyi. When they first hatch, they may have barely visable markings or not. As adults few have barely visable markings, but most were pure black.
I often think most tharyi breeders now-a-days, are extremely spoiled and naive. In fact, most wild tharyi are Bung ugly, and the common color is dark. With ugly grey being very popular. Of course the great interest was in the ones that did not fit this bill. The nice ones were of great interest.
With that in mind, its the nice ones that became the breeding stock in captivity, not the ugly ones. So I imagine that when they pop up here and there, people are very surprised. But I think its only to be expected.
To understand this better, genetically, these snakes produce a range of colors and patterns, this insures success under a varity of prevailing and changing conditions. In captivity, we can inbreed lines and clean them up to a certain point, but we never have created pure lines. That is, milksnake tharyi do not alway produce milksnake neonates and buckskins do not always produce buckskins, there is always some variation. I do imagine if we keep line breeding them, the percentage will get higher and higher. But people often feel the need to outbreed, which starts this silly game all over again.
So unless you have knowledge of the exact longterm history of your animals, making prodictions about color and pattern is about like spitting in the wind. It certainly will come back and hit you in the face. Cheers FR