Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

question bout breeding dwarfs to normals

BrianL Jul 18, 2003 03:56 PM

Hi.. I was wondering how one would breed a dwarf to a normal size retic.. Would the female HAVE to be the dwarf to produce smaller babies, and then would all the babies be smaller than normal?

Or could you use a dwarf male and breed to a normal size female? What a size difference huh? WOuld this also work, or because of the large egg size teh normal size female produces, would the babies be larger and never be dwarfs?

Thanks

Replies (4)

BrianL Jul 21, 2003 12:34 AM

.

tango Jul 21, 2003 08:04 AM

I'm giving you my opinion only- I've not bred retics nor do I plan to breed intergrades.
It seems that if egg size would be an issue to a female she is better off being the regular- sized retic and using a dwarf male. That is only for laying the eggs- I am thinking that a dwarf female may have some trouble passing the larger eggs from a normal-sized male but I could be mistaken. The babies would carry 1/2 the genes of each so if the dwarf is truly a dwarf he (or she) would pass on those genes. I believe there is a size difference in the babies depending on which parent is a dwarf in mammal reproduction but I don't know if that holds true for retics. As for the size difference in a dwarf male and normal-sized female from what I've read on the subject of sexual dimorphism, it would pose no insurmountable challenge to the male. Best wishes,
-----
Marcia Pimentel
Tango River Reptiles
GiantFeeders

serpentinedreams Jul 21, 2003 02:24 PM

I was a bit shocked by the size of the Dwarf Tigers that Mike Wilbanks hatched as newborns. The animals I recieved had not yet eaten and just had there first shed. I was expecting smaller babys simply, after hatching pure jampeas. The parents were a male dwarf and normal sized female, the babys were very close to the size of a newborn normal retic. I suppose that the size of the mother definetly plays a direct roll in the size of the eggs, and thus the babys at birth. I wouldent guess that these animals geneticaly would be any diffrent than the cross if it was to happen the other way around, only larger at birth. In other words I think the potential will be the same of course directly related to both parents. But these are all new too us so, I expect we will learn more about how it works in the future.
-Thanks Shaun DeBord

mrci Jul 21, 2003 05:35 PM

The size of the father in no way influences the size of the egg. There's no reason a normal father would cause any sort of problem with a dwarf mother.

Site Tools