"I think the flack you received was primarily from people who do legitimate rescues and there is a very good reason for that."
- So you are saying that it is not a "legitimate rescue" if you pay for it? Can you please tell me in what definition you are using for that statement? The English dictionaries I have found must be missing that part. (Just to make sure I also checked in Spanish, French, and a couple of obscure African dialects that our little ball friends might be used to... or at least that those who are captive bred may know a derivative of). Yet none say anything about finances entering in the picture.
"Those of us who do rescue many many animals every year cannot pay to do so - we constantly have people that want us to "buy" their animal - but we cannot - that is not what we do."
- How do you know that those on the other side of this tollbooth restriction that you have placed here have not rescued many, many more? Though when you refine terms and words I guess it is easy to make that kind of statement.
“As a representative of a herp society you should have known better than to have represented yourself or the transaction as a rescue - facilitating the misconception that rescuers will "buy" your animal if you cannot care for it.”
- You should have known better? That is just flat out rude and uncalled for. But as I have seen in the past people do have different views on things. Some people feel that others sold sick animals just trying to make a quick buck while the seller claim that the animals were healthy. I guess it all gets down to definition.
I am not trying to get involved in a flame war but I am also not going to sit back while someone insults me and others for “illegitimate rescues” when we have the animal’s best interest at heart and not just using our many many rescues as an attempt to elevate ourselves, our soapboxes and our views above everyone else.
E4, I understand the point that the other person was the person you see as the rescuer, but I don’t think there is much of a difference between his actions and yours. Some just seem to be missing the fact that the animal is in better care. I know not everyone can do that, but is it better to see the animal die? I am not debating the moral issue of it, I agree with you, others may not, but I am going to argue with someone that is going to make up definitions to suit their needs and state that it is not a rescue or a legitimate rescue. The guy that rescued it did good, you did good, snake happy. It is in better care… “rescue”…
-----
Bryan, Atlanta GA
1-0-0 Ball Python - Apep
0-1-0 Mountain Horned Dragon - Ki
0-0-1 Aggressive Bearded Dragon - Zeus
1-1-0 Rats... no wait... ROTTEN Little Cats - Ra, Bastet
0-1-0 Little Angelic Kitten - Isis
1-0-0 Horse... whoops... BIG Golden Retriever - Jake
0-1-0 Wife
2-0-0 Kids