Next year i plan on crossing my banana cal kings to my pueblan/nelsons (50/50). and the offspring back to the pueblan/nelsons. my question is can these still be considered imperial pueblans or would they need a new classification?
-----
SNAKES
1.2 albino cal kings
1.0 het albino bananna
2.1 albino banannas
1.1 mexican blacks
1.1.1 knoblochi
1.1 pyros
1.2 mex mex
1.1 66% het hypo durangos
1.1 sinaloan milks
1.1 het hypo tangerine hondurans
1.1 cornsnakes (ghost, okeete)
0.1 albino ruthven
1.1 thayeri
GECKOS
1.1 snow leopard geckos
0.1 albino leopard gecko
2.1 leusistic leopard geckos
0.1.1 hypo tangerine leoaprd geckos
0.1 tremper giant albino tangerine leopard gecko
1.0 carrot head, tangerine, giant jungle albino
2.2 normal leopard geckos (one pair w/solid black eyes)
2.1 tokays
1.1 african fat-tails
1.1.2 crested geckos (fires, red, yellow dalmation)
Reptile & Amphibian Forums
Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.
would these still be imperial pueblans?
kirkpatrick
Oct 06, 2005 06:44 PM
Replies (1)
bluerosy
Oct 06, 2005 08:08 PM
The Imperial name is already taken for the pueblen X amle banana calif king. I think that the painted kings are the same thing. No need to confuse things any further.
Personally I think we shuld do away with the catchy name phrases and just list them for what they are.
