ok will,first of all-not calling anyone a liar-but when i requested the background info in the past on these kings,while i appreciated your cooperative response,it left me wanting...second ,that is a nice and intruiging(?) loooking king,esp the one in the first post....what credentials do i have?i'm just heavily into herping(anywhere i can,not just where i live) and keeping c.b. colubrids esp. lampropeltines....locality data is important and interesting info to me(though i think it's being a little overstressed lately regarding certain species,like you said when it comes to county-by-county,esp. when there are no natural boundaries separating such counties/districts,i.e. of course a county line means little to a snake crawling across it)...however,the potomac river separates va. from d.c.,and as you probably know that is no small stream,though i am aware kings are decent swimmers,indeed i more often than not find them close to water-though not usually rivers,more like swamps or creeks-permanent and/or slow-moving bodies...i know they could still cross this river in spots-but on the va. side is terrain ranging from full residential development dating to the 1800's(=nearly total habitat destruction), to at best a very narrow band of natural terrain-rocky cliffs,more vertical than flat...what snakes are found there?aside from natricines,lampropeltis t. triangulum,agkistrodon contortrix,elaphe obsoleta....(notice the first two have very small home ranges;the latter has simply been able to survive in developed areas thus far...all 3 are usually found in this type of rocky terrain;i have never found a king in such terrain,nor do i hear much about that happening.... and i was born in the district(spare me the wisecracks,thanks,lol),have lived in and/or around this area for all my 32 years,and have been doing whatever herping can be done here for better than 20 years,with a grand total of zero kings found in the district proper,much to my dismay....i know the district very well-and of course kings occured here in the fairly recent past,i have records of this myself(most recent one i can find claims circa 1945)....bottom line,will,i know it's a possiblity they occur in d.c.;i never said it was not.....i just said,and still do feel,it's a good bet they are now extirpated from there...i hope as much as you do that they are still hanging in there,how cool would that be?....i can see how me calling it 'misleading' could have been taken as a slight,or me challenging someone's honesty,etc...not my intention at all...i simply meant,TO ME,it implies that they have in fact been found there more recently than any specimens have been(AS FAR AS I KNOW-and let me be the first to say,indeed there may have been!),and others may get that impression as well....ok,hope this clarified what i was trying to say,will...justin