Before reading further, this isn't an attack on ANYONE nor is it an attempt to prove ME right or anyone else wrong. It is just a further explaination of my thoughts....
>>Back when the first creamsicles were produced, most hobbyists considered emoryi just a subspecies of corn.
So why not a creamsicle RAT instead of a creamsicle CORN since tyhey were subspecies? See the problem I find with that logic?
>>Also, it seems more natural to call the hybrid a jungle corn than a jungle king because it is the corns that are so heavily hybridized with practically everything, not the kings. So whether it is mixed with milk, king, or gopher snake, the common denominator is corn.
>>
>>I think that is more of a reason for the names rather than an intent to deceive anyone.
You are correct IMO, BUT that is because corns are the DUMPING ground for hybrids, etc. ....or at least the captive corn gene pool is the hybrid dumping ground now. Why? because of the names and what that subconsciously does to the way people think. Hyrbids with corns are called corns, so they are corns.... That's what is going on in too many people's minds probably without them even knowing it. Your reasoning just explains why they are the dumping ground. I wasn't denying that.
If they were called creamsicle hybrids or jungle hybrids or ..... wouldn't that make you think differently than calling them corns does? Of course - that is how humans are effected by language even though MOST of us don't realize it.
A good example is to look at words like incest, child molesting, and rape. Which one sounds most violent, etc? To me, RAPE has the most violent connotations, but it may not be physically violent at all. Heck, if you "rape" a young child it is molestation (but rape on an adult) unless they are kin to you in which it is called incest by some. Same ACT, but has different connotations depending on the term used. How often do you ehear of someone molesting an adult? it is rare, because it is called rape then.
For this reason above, I very seldom use the terms molest or incest. It is ALL rape. Rape of a woman, rape of a child, rape of a kin, etc. It is the worst sounding term because the action is horrible. The sentence should be based on the act and not the name, too. Calling them all rape effects what people thinks. (Who would you despise most: someone that RAPED a child or someone that molested a child - even if the actions were identical?) I'm not making any comparison between rape and hybridization because thay is an OT argument.
In that manner, calling it a creamsicle hybrid instead of a creamsicle corn is the same story.
What would sell better: a creamsicle corn or a creamsicle hybrid or a creamsicle rat, a jungle corn or a jungle hybrid or jungle king, or.... The name CORN sells it because people LIKE to own corns often more than hybrids even if they don't have anything AGAINST hybrids. How much of THAT has to do with the naming of a hybrid than ANY attempt to NOT mislead? (Note: misleading is wrong, but many people still don't go out of their way to LEAD someone to the truth, either.....)
Anyway, fun topic....
KJ