First of all, about all the disscussion on subspecies/locality .... great topic! I like many other people really do feel that it is important to keep track of where exactly our stock is coming from. I also think it is fine to mix and match different stocks within subspecies (and their offsping) with morphs or pattern quality as a goal. However I really do feel that this has its limitations and it is important to have new wild stock to work with - for the beauty of its own natural form as well as the new genetic variety it can bring to the existing pool (even if it is not hypo, albino, anery ....) Not only is the "new" stock important but the documentation of its geographical regions and the visible variety in different areas. There really is no point in importing wild stock from the same place year after year is there.
For these reasons I would love to travel to Guatemala/Honduras and other nearby countries, hoping to at least find some milks! Then if successful at this keep some records of where certain varieties can be found - Ideally sending some back home (if possible). Lately I have been very enthused about obtaining new varieties of hondurans but I think an even greater pleasure would be to find one in the wild, then find a second FAR from the first and compare the two. Personally I don't know how much this has been done but could anybody please comment on what they know about the legal side of importing wild caught animals from these countries and also anything else about current importers? Thanks for your time - hope to see some responses here even if short.




