Have or at one time had longer hemiclitori than most male monitors of the same species hemipenes. One of those females with long hemiclitori is a water monitor I know of, one is Sobek. So if someone who could possibly probe a monitor that has been put under anesthesia and not hurt or damage it, how accurate is the depth of probing? Also there would have to be a known reference point on depth for the size and age of all species as well known males and females to even come close to being accurate.
I had a great herp vet, very experienced tell me he could probe a monitor and "possibly guess at its sex", I asked why, he explained that snakes are commonly probed and have easily accessible references on depth by sex and species, he also said that lizards are different, probing "if it can be done without the chance of harming them" is not accurate. This vet also stated that Sobek was male from outword appearance, etc. I told him there is no chance Id ever get a monitor probed.
He also told me just as the new herp vet I have has said, that the only accurate way is to be able to recognize a male from a female outwardly or to insert an endoscope near the lizards hip area and look for ovaries or testes. Why risk permanent damage, risk an operation, when you can wait to discover the animals sex less intrusively.
Ive discussed this with more than a few vets (probing monitors), there are a few that will say they can do it, but they either wont tell you how accurate their guess will be afterwards, or that there is a big risk because they are built different, probing works as it was designed on snakes, not lizards. Yet Ive found the good knowledeable vets will tell you the truth before asking you if you want to take the risk.
Of course the choice to try it is the keepers, by all means, do as you please with your monitors.
