One of several major problems that I have with the commercially available cages which are readily available at the moment, aside from their ridiculously limiting spacial features(another big peeve of mine which I will not get into here), is that these cages are 'generic' and supposedly built to house any species of snake/lizard, all at the same time, offering nothing beneficial to the animals themselves.
Each species has its own specific environmental and physiological requirements and needs, which are thereby used to carry out healthy and uncomprimised physiological processes, and allow for a normal day to day life(what the animals are programmed/adapted for). Such environmental factors which are crucial to an animal's physiology and well-being include(but are not limited to) temperature range/gradients, humidity levels(which vary within any environment), hiding spots, spacial distribution, visual barriers to other individuals/cagemates, deep substrate, etc.. All of these factors play an important role in the survival strategies of each species, and are used differently across the board between species.
Yet these commercial caging companies offer no variation between caging, insisting that a ball python has exactly the same environmental needs(all snakes must come from the same type of environment according to their approach), and should live within the same environmental constraints as blood pythons; boa constrictors the same as anthill pythons; tegus the same as bearded dragons, etc... etc.. etc...
Yes, animals, regardless of species and physiological needs, can live and survive within these "one cage fits all" enclosures, however what is the true quality of life? There is a difference between living an ideal, healthy, and burdon-free live, and one in which the animal just 'survives'-whereby certain physiological functions are comprimised or hindered. I for one model my husbandry around what's best for my captives through testing and experimention, and am always seeking out new methods for improving the environmental conditions offered to my captives.
The learning process never stops with us and our captives. Nobody is a true "Expert" with their captives, regardless of how many times you bred a species or whatnot. There is always new information to be learned through our captives. Yet so many people have stopped thinking about or questioning what's truly best for their animals, or what can be doen to make things better; instead settling for these "one cage fits all" setups, and never bothering to study or experiment with what the animals choose to be what's best for them.
Has herpetoculture reached a pinnacle; a point where we can no longer make the lives for our animals better? Why 'give up' and offer these 'generic' caging for our animals? Convenience for us the keeper?? To me, this is a step in the wrong direction, as far as progression goes, and I personally feel that keeping animals according to what's convenient for you the keeper is a rather selfish and bull-headed approach to keeping a live animal in captivity. I think we should always be striving for what's best for our captives; modeling our husbandry and the conditions which we offer our captives around the specific environmental needs and ecological requirements of our animals; rather than using the "it's good enough approach".
When I look at my own approach or conditions which I offer to my captives, I always ask myself the simple and fundamental question, "How does this cage, object, condition, or technique benefit the animal living within?" For those who are using the cheap and generic commercial caging, I suggest you ask yourself this very same question:
What do these commercial cages have to offer to the particular animal within, which will benefit the life of your captive; instead of asking how it is of benefit to yourself, the keeper?
The truth of it all is that all species are different, and have different environmental and physiological needs(even subspecies within the same species). They use different environmental conditions and resources in the wild to carry out natural processes, behaviors, and events. So why keep them in these "one cage fits all" setups, which offer vastly different conditions from what they are adapted for, and instictively use out in the wild?
If it was the health nd well being of your animal that really mattered, I see no reason why anyone would confrom to this approach.
Cheers,
Bob
-----
Treemonitors.com