The male from my original pair is a perfectly marked Bull’s-eye Albino Nelson’s; 16 red bands, no triads extend to the belly, no crossovers, and some noticeable red on his snout. I need to get a picture one of these days. As much as I admire him though he is fairly “unremarkable”, that is, I would not consider him anything but a nice example of an Albino Nelson’s. The female from the original pair is even less remarkable being a normal het for Albino; she does have the red tail however.
I bought the pair (trio but one girl wouldn’t produce fertile eggs) because the breeder I got them from had the best looking Nelsoni of any I had seen anywhere else (the perfectly marked male) AND (it’s a big and) he had also produced at least one patternless from the same stock. He sold out right after I bought mine. I was able to track him down, with a little help, a couple of years ago but he did not know what happened to his breeding stock after he sold it (including the Patternless one).
I know of at least one other that Scott from VMS produced. It could have come from the same stock but Scott said his came from a Sinaloan pair. I have produced two so yes it is an inheritable trait; I think it is a simple recessive but it could be more complicated. Remember though the pair that has produced these are not aberrant looking at all (why I think it is recessive). The very high band count ones came from the original male bred back to a daughter but the original pair has produced a couple with 17 and 18 red bands too.
Here’s a picture of the 2004 Patternless (perfectly patternless)

-----
Rick
Never Enough
Reptiles
